FAA Says Proposed Massachusetts Wind Turbine Too Tall | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jan 11, 2010

FAA Says Proposed Massachusetts Wind Turbine Too Tall

Planned Structure Is 5.5 Miles From New Bedford Regional Airport

One of two wind turbines proposed by the city of Dartmouth, Massachusetts could interfere with air navigation, the FAA has told the city. The FAA said that the planned 462 foot structure "exceeds obstruction standards and/or would have an adverse physical or electromagnetic interference" for aircraft approaching new Bedford Regional Airport.

According to Southcoast Today, the FAA recommends lowering the overall height of the structure to 417 feet from blade tip to base, or, if an independent analysis of the terrain meets with FAA approval, reducing the structure to 428 feet.

The FAA ruling applies only to the north turbine. The agency is still considering the south structure. Dr. Ronald DiPippo, chairman of the town's Alternative Energy Committee, told the paper the height of the pole to the hub would have to be reduced 35 feet to meet the 428 foot maximum. Select Board Chairman Joseph L. Michaud said the town will conduct a site survey and attempt to win FAA approval the taller tower. He said he expects the south turbine to be approved at 462 feet because it is further from the airport.

DiPippo said the town expects to save over $500,000 in the first year in energy costs by constructing the two turbines on land the municipality owns. But, he said, that would have been about $100,000 more if the taller tower could have been built.

The paper reports that the council members are not entirely surprised the FAA came back proposing changes. "We figured there would be some adjustments to the project," Michaud said. "It's not a major adjustment and it should be more favorable with the people who have concerns about the height."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC