NATA Requests Waiver Of McArthur Airport Landing Fees For 'Based' Aircraft | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 16, 2014

NATA Requests Waiver Of McArthur Airport Landing Fees For 'Based' Aircraft

New Fee Schedule Includes Resident Airplanes, Boosts Cost Of Night Landings

National Air Transportation Association (NATA) President and CEO Thomas L. Hendricks has written to the Town of Islip, NY, requesting it drop recently imposed landing fees on aircraft based at Long Island MacArthur Airport (ISP). The Town of Islip imposed landing fees on all aircraft effective September 1, 2014, and for the first time made them applicable to "based" aircraft. In addition, the new fee schedule established even higher rates for night landings.

NATA represents a broad array of aviation service business essential to a vibrant general aviation sector including companies located at ISP.

In the letter, Hendricks (pictured) requested reconsideration of the new fees, noting the intended increase would likely lead to reduced business and investment and potential job loss at the airport. Hendricks also posed a series of questions to Islip officials in order to determine if the additional nighttime landing fee is consistent with the airport's grant assurance obligations, observing that the imposition of higher fees for nighttime operations at ISP appears to be a defacto attempt to curb traffic, which requires specific approval of the FAA.

Hendricks closed by noting, “Ultimately, aircraft owners and operators will choose their airport based on a variety of factors including the availability of lower-cost alternatives. To preserve ISP as a vibrant economic engine for the community, it is critical to ensure the airport remains cost-competitive with other nearby facilities.”

FMI: www.nata.aero

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC