Body Scanners May Not Be So Private After All | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Thu, Jan 14, 2010

Body Scanners May Not Be So Private After All

Test Mode Allows Images To Be Saved, Transmitted

Since their introduction, privacy advocates have publicly worried that images from full-body scans at the airport might wind up on the internet. TSA assured us on its website that "The machines have zero storage capability."
 
At some airports where the technology is in use, TSA plays a video in the screening area which asserts, "...the system has no way to save, transmit or print the image."
 
But CNN reports that EPIC, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, found that the machines have a test mode in which the images can not only be stored, but transmitted. EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg says that opens the possibilities of abuse by insiders, or even hackers. The  "Level Z" authority for TSA allows the security agency to disable privacy filters and to export raw image files.
 
EPIC obtained the information on the machines through a Freedom of Information Act request. Rotenberg is critical of what he calls "slick promotion" by the TSA. "[I]f you look at the actual technical specifications and you read the vendor contracts, you come to understand that these machines are capable of doing far more than the TSA has let on."
 
TSA has responded by saying adequate safeguards are in place. The officer viewing the images cannot see the passenger being scanned, the machines are not networked and cannot be hacked, no cellphones or other photographic devices are allowed in the viewing rooms, and violators are subject to serious discipline or removal.
 
All of which may be true, but then YouTube is filled with bootleg concert videos from venues where no cameras are allowed, and TSA reportedly has declined to cooperate in the prosecution of its workers when they're caught stealing at airports, citing security concerns.

FMI: http://epic.org, www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC