Body Scanners May Not Be So Private After All | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 14, 2010

Body Scanners May Not Be So Private After All

Test Mode Allows Images To Be Saved, Transmitted

Since their introduction, privacy advocates have publicly worried that images from full-body scans at the airport might wind up on the internet. TSA assured us on its website that "The machines have zero storage capability."
 
At some airports where the technology is in use, TSA plays a video in the screening area which asserts, "...the system has no way to save, transmit or print the image."
 
But CNN reports that EPIC, the Electronic Privacy Information Center, found that the machines have a test mode in which the images can not only be stored, but transmitted. EPIC Executive Director Marc Rotenberg says that opens the possibilities of abuse by insiders, or even hackers. The  "Level Z" authority for TSA allows the security agency to disable privacy filters and to export raw image files.
 
EPIC obtained the information on the machines through a Freedom of Information Act request. Rotenberg is critical of what he calls "slick promotion" by the TSA. "[I]f you look at the actual technical specifications and you read the vendor contracts, you come to understand that these machines are capable of doing far more than the TSA has let on."
 
TSA has responded by saying adequate safeguards are in place. The officer viewing the images cannot see the passenger being scanned, the machines are not networked and cannot be hacked, no cellphones or other photographic devices are allowed in the viewing rooms, and violators are subject to serious discipline or removal.
 
All of which may be true, but then YouTube is filled with bootleg concert videos from venues where no cameras are allowed, and TSA reportedly has declined to cooperate in the prosecution of its workers when they're caught stealing at airports, citing security concerns.

FMI: http://epic.org, www.tsa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC