DOT Investigates Unrealistic Airline Schedules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Apr 24, 2007

DOT Investigates Unrealistic Airline Schedules

Actual Arrival Times May Vary... A Lot

It may be hard to believe... but several domestic airlines are publishing flight schedules the carriers know to be, at best, dazzlingly optimistic... and at worst, horribly inaccurate.

That's the word from the Department of Transportation, anyway, which last week said it has launched an investigation into the alleged inaccurate scheduling. The New York Times states as many as eight airlines face potential fines for failing to tell the truth in their flight schedules.

An unnamed DOT spokesman told the paper the agency has contacted airlines 160 times for information about delays on specific flights... requests the carriers failed to heed 41 percent of the time.

Information the DOT was able to collect shows 143 flights in February that were late 15 minutes or more, at least 80 percent of the time.

The agency also found one US Airways flight that, literally, is NEVER on time. On average, Flight 154 from Philadelphia to San Francisco arrives 61 minutes behind its published arrival time.

News like that does not sit well with lawmakers, meeting to determine whether federal action is necessary to insure the rights of passengers on airline flights, as the summer travel -- and storm -- season looms.

“I was pretty exasperated,” said House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee chairman James L. Oberstar (D-MN). “They don’t learn from each other,” he added, in reference to carriers failing to learn from the mistakes of their competitors.

The airlines state federal interaction is unnecessary, and the problems would best be left to the individual carriers to solve.

Airlines want to be left alone to deal with the problems, and the Transportation Department has thus far mostly agreed with that approach. But some in Congress feel otherwise.

FMI: www.dot.gov, www.airlines.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC