Alabama Supreme Court Tosses Lawsuit Suit Stemming From 2005 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sun, Jul 21, 2013

Alabama Supreme Court Tosses Lawsuit Suit Stemming From 2005 Accident

Said Accident, Which Occurred in Oklahoma, Happened Too Long Ago

The Alabama Supreme Court says that Teledyne Continental Motors has waited too long to try to recover legal fees and court costs from the manufacturer of an engine component that was implicated in an accident which fatally injured three people.

The three fatally injured were Harland Brent Stonecipher, who was employed as a pilot by Pre-Paid Legal Services, now known as LegalShield; his wife Tina and his 11-year-old daughter Nicole. The NTSB found in its probable cause report that the Cessna 310 Stonecipher was flying suffered a loss of engine power as a result of a fatigue fracture in one of the crankshaft gear teeth for undetermined reasons. Also causal was the pilot's failure to maintain control of the twin-engine airplane after the power loss, which resulted in an inadvertent stall and subsequent collision with terrain.

Continental at the time tried to recreate the manufacturing process that could have led to the failure of the gear, but was unable to do so. The NTSB said the cause of the gear tooth failure could not be determined. The company eventually settled the first lawsuit brought in 2007.

The Insurance Journal reports that Continental sued the company which manufactured the crankshaft that failed in 2011, saying the part did not meet its specifications. A judge initially ruled that Alabama's two-year statute of limitations did not apply, using the standard of six years for contract claims.

But this week, the Alabama Supreme Court disagreed, saying the two-year limit should apply, and dismissed the case. Continental had no comment on the ruling.

FMI: http://judicial.alabama.gov/supreme.cfm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC