Automation vs. Autonomy In Urban Air Mobility | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Nov 19, 2019

Automation vs. Autonomy In Urban Air Mobility

How Urban Air Mobility Vehicles Are Helping To Lay The Groundwork For More Autonomous Flight

Self-piloting technologies are having a huge impact on mobility solutions—both on the ground and in the air. But the leap from automated to autonomous is still a work in progress. Although fully autonomous aircraft are still many years away, urban air mobility vehicles are proving to be an excellent option to start the roll-out of self-piloting aircraft operations.

Greater reliability, improved performance and reduced costs: the perceived benefits of automation have made it one of this century’s most significant industrial trends. In fact, automation in manufacturing has become so widespread that robots, artificial intelligence and machine learning are now an integral part of the manufacturing process.

In mobility, automation is also set to make a significant impact on how we move in the future. Automotive manufacturers around the world are exploring the potential of self-driving cars, which promise to drastically reduce vehicle accidents, improve road safety and free up valuable time.  

While certain levels of automation are already available in many vehicles—such as cruise control, steering assistance and self-parking—it will be a number of years before self-driving cars hit the roads. This is, in part, because road systems are highly complex environments in which hazards abound—from other road users to pedestrians and debris.       

The sky, however, is a very different story. Aircraft operate in a much sparser environment. Air hazards—such as other aircraft, birds, and drones—are rarely encountered compared to ground hazards, which are often minimised by applying safety means at landing and take-off sites. If a hazard is encountered, the aircraft can move in three dimensions to avoid it.

When viewed from the perspective of risk and impact, this vast difference in hazard density and response options suggests that autonomy in aviation faces a much different challenge in getting off the ground than its automotive counterparts.

Although sometimes used interchangeably, automation and autonomy are not synonymous. The difference can be summarised as follows:

  • Automation refers to the ability of a system to control a vehicle, like autopilot or cruise control.
  • Autonomy is the ability of a system to not only control a vehicle but respond to unexpected hazards.

Two very different paths can be taken to achieve a fully autonomous aircraft. Fall-back pilot: During development, a “fall-back,” or safety pilot is always on board to take control at any time, for any reason. As the autonomy system becomes more reliable, the fall-back pilot will eventually become redundant.

"Full autonomy from the beginning: Operating solely in constrained environments enables the autonomy system to be implemented from the very beginning for safe and extensive testing," said Arne Stoschek, Project Wayfinder, A^3 by Airbus. "In ‘autonomous’ flight, the aircraft has to be able to make decisions and react to unforeseen events without the pilot’s intervention."

Using the fall-back pilot enables the aircraft to become airborne more quickly, but it requires significant investment in systems that will, ultimately, not be needed. Starting with full autonomy eliminates the need for human-machine interfaces, but obtaining certification and public acceptance can be a challenge.

Some manufacturers, like Airbus, are already taking the latter option: new urban air mobility vehicles like Vahana have been designed to integrate self-piloting functionalities from the start. This is because flying taxi missions involve short, point-to-point flights along a restricted selection of routes using limited landing infrastructure, thus making urban air vehicles an ideal choice for testing self-piloting operations in aircraft. Although the technology is still not mature enough to transport passengers, autonomy in aircraft operations will undoubtedly be shaped by self-piloting, flying taxi demonstrators like Vahana.

(Images provided with Airbus news release and from file)

FMI: www.airbus.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC