Alaska Airlines Files Motion In SeaTac Proposition 1 Legal Challenge | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Thu, Dec 17, 2015

Alaska Airlines Files Motion In SeaTac Proposition 1 Legal Challenge

Alaska, Other Parties Ask Trial Court To Examine Initiative's Impact To Airport Operations

Alaska Airlines, Filo Foods, BF Foods and the Washington Restaurant Association have filed a motion in King County Superior Court asking the trial court to hear evidence on whether the City of SeaTac's Proposition 1 ordinance interferes with the Port of Seattle's authority to run the airport.

Among other things, the city's Proposition 1 established a $15 per hour minimum wage for all workers.

In August, the Washington state Supreme Court issued its opinion on Proposition 1 and, as part of the usual legal process, sent the case back to King County Superior Court for further proceedings in accordance with the Supreme Court's decision.

When the Supreme Court issued its opinion over the summer, it created a new standard for evaluating the ordinance. However, when the Proposition 1 case was first brought before the Superior Court in 2013, the lower court ruled on summary judgment and did not use the Supreme Court's new standard. The Superior Court instead heard legal arguments on whether the airport could, as a matter of state law, be regulated by the city in which it's located, not on the ordinance's impact to airport operations.

"We believe that the trial court judge should hold a fact finding process so she can ultimately decide whether the ordinance interferes with or relates to airport operations," said Herman Wacker, vice president legal and general counsel for Alaska Airlines. Wacker noted that the Supreme Court's opinion is not the last step in the legal process in this case.

Following any Superior Court determination on whether Proposition 1 relates to airport operations, either party then would have the right to re-engage the appeal process.

"Today's challenge is focused on the legality of the City of SeaTac's ordinances over the airport," said Joe Sprague, Alaska Airlines' senior vice president, communications and external relations. "We support higher minimum wages that are reasonable and equitable across the state."

(Source: Alaska Airlines news release. Image from file)

FMI: www.alaskaair.com, SeaTac Prop 1

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.24)

"It is extremely difficult, if not impossible, for manned aircraft to see a drone while conducting crop-enhancing and other aerial applications at low altitudes and high speeds. We>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.24)

“The T-54A benefits from an active Beechcraft King Air assembly line in Wichita, Kansas, where all required METS avionics and interior modifications are installed on the line>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.29.24)

Aero Linx: Aerostar Owners Association The Association offers the Aerostar Owner a unique opportunity to tap an invaluable source of information concerning the care and feeding of >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC