Pentagon Reportedly Overcharging Armed Forces For Fuel | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sat, May 27, 2017

Pentagon Reportedly Overcharging Armed Forces For Fuel

Using Surpluses For A Variety Of Purposes

The Pentagon has reportedly been overcharging its armed services for fuel, including aviation fuel, to generate extra money for training Syrian rebels, bolster a prescription drug program, and cover unbudgeted costs for the war in Afghanistan.

MSN reports that as much as $6 billion has been generated by overcharging for fuel over the past seven years. 

Since WWII, the Defense Department has used a system under which it purchases fuel centrally and then sells it to the various armed services, which pay for the fuel out of their own budgets. It was intended to reduce redundancy and be more efficient. The Pentagon buys about 4.2 billion gallons of fuel each year.

But according to the report, the services have been charged up to $1 per gallon more than airlines pay for jet fuel on the open market, which has led to what some critics call a "bishop's fund" of $6 billion. 

Congress is aware of the practice, and has routinely approved of the Pentagon's request to divert excess money from fuel sales to other programs as a way of balancing the DOD's checkbook. But some are now asking questions about the practice that has resulted in what has been called a "slush fund" for the Pentagon.

In a statement, the Pentagon admitted that it had collected what it described as "enterprise gains" in the amount of $5.6 billion between 2010 and 2016, but said the discrepancy was due to falling oil prices and an "inherently volatile market."

FMI: Original Report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC