Major to Face Dereliction-Of-Duty Charges | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jul 02, 2003

Major to Face Dereliction-Of-Duty Charges

It's Not Homicide, Manslaughter, or Assault; But It's Serious

Maj. Harry Schmidt, 37, could get six months in prison, if he is convicted of dereliction of duty, charges that remain after a Monday court martial hearing by the Air Force.

Schmidt was flying an F-16, and was one of two pilots who dropped bombs on what the pair thought were hostile troops, in Afghanistan, on April 17, 2002. The troops were Canadians, engaged in an exercise. Four died; another dozen were injured.

Maj. William Umbach, the mission commander, asked for early retirement. He was repremanded and allowed to retire; all charges against him were dropped.

Schmidt says he doesn't think he is guilty, and preferred a court martial -- even on homicide charges, which were a possibility at the time -- to an administrative punishment, where he maintained he couldn't get fair treatment. If convicted of dereliction of duty, he could spend half a year in prison.

Schmidt says he was given no indication that friendlies were conducting exercises in the area where he dropped his bomb. His lawyer says that the Air Force's earlier musings about homicide charges may have been a bluff. The decision to proceed on only the dereliction charge, "reinforces the fact that Harry didn't act criminally and shouldn't have been charged criminally," he said.

The more-serious charges haven't been dropped; if Schmidt wins the first round, they could be reinstated.

That scenario, though possible, is considered a long shot.

FMI: www.af.mil; www.centcom.mil/CENTCOMNews/Reports/Tarnak_Farms_Report.htm

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC