FAA Removes SID Chart Obstacle Notes To Cut Clutter | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Tue, Aug 15, 2017

FAA Removes SID Chart Obstacle Notes To Cut Clutter

Changes Effective With The August 17 Charting Cycle

With the Aug. 17 charting cycle, pilots will find revised SID charts easier to read because the FAA is removing the takeoff obstacle notes from them.

The obstacles are still there, said Rich Boll, chair of the Airspace, Air Traffic, and Flight Technology Working Group of NBAA’s Access Committee. “If these obstacles are a factor on departure, pilots will find the necessary information in the Takeoff Minimums and Obstacle Departure Procedure section, which are located on the front of the government charts and on the back of Jeppesen’s 10-9 airport chart.”

In 2015, NBAA requested the removal of the SID obstacle notes at a semi-annual meeting of the Aeronautical Charting Forum, in which industry provides input to the FAA on charting and the design of instrument procedures, said Boll, one of NBAA’s principal representatives.

“Several years ago, the FAA started charting obstacles located within a mile of the departure end of the runway, and which require a higher-than-standard climb gradient to a height not greater than 200 feet above the elevation of the departure end of the runway, in lieu of publishing the higher climb gradient,” he said.

In recent years, improved surveys steadily increased the number of obstacles being charted, consuming much of the available white space on the charts, which made it harder comprehend the SID.

“On government charts, some procedures often needed another page to list them all,” said Boll. “It was a white-space issue. The charts became cluttered to the point that pilots would ignore the obstacle data,” because at larger airports, they were rarely a factor, given the takeoff field length.

The obstacle data “is more critical to lower-performance aircraft, such piston singles and twins,” Boll explained. “It depends on the takeoff distance needed to reach 50 feet.” Because this information was already provided elsewhere, there was no reason to include it on the SIDs.

(Source: NBAA news release. Image provided)

FMI: www.nbaa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Bolen Gives Congress a Rare Thumbs-Up

Aviation Governance Secured...At Least For a While The National Business Aviation Association similarly applauded the passage of the FAA's recent reauthorization, contentedly recou>[...]

The SportPlane Resource Guide RETURNS!!!!

Emphasis On Growing The Future of Aviation Through Concentration on 'AFFORDABLE FLYERS' It's been a number of years since the Latest Edition of Jim Campbell's HUGE SportPlane Resou>[...]

Buying Sprees Continue: Textron eAviation Takes On Amazilia Aerospace

Amazilia Aerospace GmbH, Develops Digital Flight Control, Flight Guidance And Vehicle Management Systems Textron eAviation has acquired substantially all the assets of Amazilia Aer>[...]

Hawker 4000 Bizjets Gain Nav System, Data Link STC

Honeywell's Primus Brings New Tools and Niceties for Hawker Operators Hawker 4000 business jet operators have a new installation on the table, now that the FAA has granted an STC f>[...]

Echodyne Gets BVLOS Waiver for AiRanger Aircraft

Company Celebrates Niche-but-Important Advancement in Industry Standards Echodyne has announced full integration of its proprietary 'EchoFlight' radar into the e American Aerospace>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC