ATA: Proposed Flightcrew Duty Time Rule Is Poorly Conceived | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Nov 17, 2010

ATA: Proposed Flightcrew Duty Time Rule Is Poorly Conceived

Airlines Call for Significant Revisions To Existing Proposal

The Air Transport Association of America (ATA) submitted its public comments Monday to the FAA in response to the agency's Flightcrew Member Duty and Rest Requirements NPRM, calling for significant revisions to the existing proposal.

"The airlines continue to strongly support regulations that demonstrably improve safety performance. That is why ATA in its role on the Aviation Rulemaking Committee was a strong supporter of a science-based approach to create a new Flightcrew Duty Time Rule," said ATA President and CEO James C. May. "We are very concerned that significant aspects of the proposed rule are not science-based."

According to May, beyond the core measures, which we support, the rule, if implemented as written, "would create onerous and duplicative regulations, which in major respects do not mitigate fatigue or increase safety. This significant operational and scheduling complexity will adversely affect our crews and customers.


James May

"We are very concerned that the proposed rule reflects a lack of understanding by FAA of how airlines operate," said May. "Our concerns are validated by the fact that FAA's economic analysis is off the mark by at least a factor of 15 in its impact assessment, making it imperative that this proposal be significantly revised."

May called on FAA to work with the airlines and other interested parties to "fashion a rule based on scientific research and operational factors."

FMI: www.airlines.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC