NATA Responds To New Private Aircraft Security Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Sep 12, 2007

NATA Responds To New Private Aircraft Security Rules

Concerned With Effect Of Proposed Rule On Small Operators

As ANN reported, on Tuesday the US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) agency released proposed rules that, if enacted, will require private aircraft operators to submit passenger manifest data prior to any arrival in or departure from the United States.

The proposal will impose passenger and crew manifest requirements on all private aircraft. The requirements are nearly identical to the manifest rules for commercial operators.

"We expect that many of the more sophisticated private aircraft operators, such as larger businesses with an extensive flight department, would be able to adapt to the proposed requirements. However, we are quite concerned with the effect of this rule on the smallest of operators," explained National Air Transportation Association President James K. Coyne.

For instance, NATA notes, currently a flight returning to the US from Canada may make required arrival notifications to the CBP via a radio transmission while en route. This would no longer be permissible under the proposal just released.

The reason the rules now permit a radio transmission is because the aircraft may not be near a telephone. In fact, some aircraft flights may originate from locations without power, let alone a high-speed Internet connection that is necessary to submit the electronic manifest data.

"It appears that these unique operations were not given sufficient consideration in the development of the new requirement," Coyne said. "We will submit detailed comments to the CBP as to how such operations might be better accommodated in the regulations."

"We look forward to working with the CBP to craft final regulations that will not overly restrict the freedom of movement that private aircraft operators cherish," Coyne concluded.

FMI: www.nata.aero, www.dhs.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC