Stimulus Sparks Debate Over O'Hare Expansion | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Sun, Feb 08, 2009

Stimulus Sparks Debate Over O'Hare Expansion

Rep. Jackson Voices Opposition To Using Taxpayer Money For OMP

Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) spoke out Friday against Republican colleague Mark Kirk's comments in the Chicago Tribune suggesting that Illinois' share of the Stimulus Package be used to expand O'Hare. Rep. Kirk voted against the Stimulus Package that would bring $22 billion to Illinois and instead suggested that the government fully fund the $20 billion O'Hare Modernization Program.

"At a time when citizens all throughout our state are in desperate need of an economic life raft, Congressman Kirk's plan leaves our citizens stranded at O'Hare," said Rep. Jackson.

"The Stimulus Package approved by Congress would bring $22 billion to Illinois to modernize schools, repair roads, improve hospitals and put people to work. Congressman Kirk prefers giving that money to the O'Hare Modernization Program -- thus depriving children, seniors and needy people of vital services."

Rep. Jackson went on to say, "There is a better alternative for adding 100,000 flights per year to Illinois. O'Hare expansion will cost $20 billion. The proposed Abraham Lincoln National Airport would add the same number flights for a fraction of the cost -- about $500 million. And that money comes from private investors -- not taxpayers."

Work on the next phase of the O'Hare expansion has not begun and funding for the $20-billion Program has not been secured. Critics of the plan cite FAA studies, which show the expansion would not provide any significant improvement of airline delays or alleviate congestion at O'Hare.

Aviation experts say that OMP will instead produce massive delays and increase costs for both consumers and airlines during and after initial construction. In addition, the airlines, including United Airlines and American Airlines, have called the OMP plan "ill-conceived" and "premature."

FMI: www.ohare.com, www.stop-omp.org

Advertisement

More News

Unfortunate... ANN/SportPlane Resource Guide Adds To Cautionary Advisories

The Industry Continues to be Rocked By Some Questionable Operations Recent investigations and a great deal of data has resulted in ANN’s SportPlane Resource Guide’s rep>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.24): Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) An airport lighting facility providing vertical visual approach slope guidance to aircraft during approach to landing by radiating a directio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC