NZ UAV Operator Fined $3,000 For A ‘Favor’ | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Wed, Sep 02, 2015

NZ UAV Operator Fined $3,000 For A ‘Favor’

Had Captured Video Of New Zealand’s Anzac Day Celebration At The Request Of The City Council

UAV operator Robert Edwards got caught up in a regulatory change that resulted in $3,000 in fines levied by the New Zealand government for flying his aircraft over the Anzac Day centenary commemoration in Palmerston North in New Zealand.

Edwards had been contracted to take some photos using his UAV by the city council of the celebration. But a change in the rules that went into effect August 1 requires UAV operators to get the permission of a landowner and the air traffic control unit overseeing the airspace of an intended flight. Palmerston North is under the jurisdiction of the Palmerston North Airport tower.

sUAS News relays a report from stuff.co.nz that there was a complaint to the New Zealand CAA, and he was hit with fines of $2,000 for operating a “model aircraft” in controlled airspace without permission, and $1,000 for operating his aircraft “at night,”

“Yes, OK, I broke the rules. I didn’t mean to,” Edwards said.

The City Council distanced itself from Edwards. Council chief executive Paddy Clifford said Edwards had been contracted to take the photos, but “it is our understanding that Mr.Edwards, ad the pilot and operator, was responsible for complying with the CAA guidelines and rules covering the use of the drone.”

Edwards had reportedly asked for some support from the council to help with his case with the CAA. A spokeswoman for the agency said that the fines are fixed, and there is no flexibility in what is imposed.

Edwards said the fines were “excessive.” Since being fined, Edwards said he’s done “four or five jobs … I have done everything right.”

(Image from file)

FMI:  www.caa.govt.nz/rpas/

Advertisement

More News

Unfortunate... ANN/SportPlane Resource Guide Adds To Cautionary Advisories

The Industry Continues to be Rocked By Some Questionable Operations Recent investigations and a great deal of data has resulted in ANN’s SportPlane Resource Guide’s rep>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.24): Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) An airport lighting facility providing vertical visual approach slope guidance to aircraft during approach to landing by radiating a directio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC