NASA Confirms Sensor Errors Led To 2004 Genesis Landing Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jun 15, 2006

NASA Confirms Sensor Errors Led To 2004 Genesis Landing Accident

Accelerometers Were Installed Backwards... By Design

What happens when you follow the instructions... but the instructions are wrong? Well, if you're an engineer on NASA's Genesis probe... you watch as your pride and joy successfully completes its trek to the sun and back, only to then make a big SPLAT in the Utah desert.

Investigators with the agency confirmed this week what NASA had speculated almost from the moment Genesis slammed into the Great Salt Lake in September 2004: subcontractor Lockheed Martin inverted two accelerometers that were supposed to trigger parachute deployment.

What's worse, however, is that technicians followed the design parameters to the letter... but the design ITSELF was wrong.

Investigators also found that Lockheed Martin skipped a pre-launch test, due to time constraints. That oversight -- which investigators linked to the "Faster, Better, Cheaper" management philosophy of former NASA director Dan Goldin -- prevented a test that would have uncovered the fatal flaw from being performed.

There are a few positives that came from Genesis, however. For one, despite scientists' worst fears, some of the solar wind particle samples Genesis collected actually survived the 100-mile-an-hour collision with terra firma.

And, perhaps even more importantly... scientists got it right with Genesis' sister probe, Stardust, which returned to earth successfully last January.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC