NASA Confirms Sensor Errors Led To 2004 Genesis Landing Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jun 15, 2006

NASA Confirms Sensor Errors Led To 2004 Genesis Landing Accident

Accelerometers Were Installed Backwards... By Design

What happens when you follow the instructions... but the instructions are wrong? Well, if you're an engineer on NASA's Genesis probe... you watch as your pride and joy successfully completes its trek to the sun and back, only to then make a big SPLAT in the Utah desert.

Investigators with the agency confirmed this week what NASA had speculated almost from the moment Genesis slammed into the Great Salt Lake in September 2004: subcontractor Lockheed Martin inverted two accelerometers that were supposed to trigger parachute deployment.

What's worse, however, is that technicians followed the design parameters to the letter... but the design ITSELF was wrong.

Investigators also found that Lockheed Martin skipped a pre-launch test, due to time constraints. That oversight -- which investigators linked to the "Faster, Better, Cheaper" management philosophy of former NASA director Dan Goldin -- prevented a test that would have uncovered the fatal flaw from being performed.

There are a few positives that came from Genesis, however. For one, despite scientists' worst fears, some of the solar wind particle samples Genesis collected actually survived the 100-mile-an-hour collision with terra firma.

And, perhaps even more importantly... scientists got it right with Genesis' sister probe, Stardust, which returned to earth successfully last January.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC