Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Dec 01, 2010

Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports

F135 Engine Will Not Fit Through Standard COD Cargo Door Or On V-22 Osprey

The Navy is facing a significant challenge with the F135 engine developed by Pratt & Whitney for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter ... they can't get spare engines to an aircraft carrier by air or sea.


File Photo

The Navy Times reports that, even when it is broken down into its five components, the power module and packaging on the F135 engine will not fit through the cargo door of a standard Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) aircraft, or aboard a V-22 Osprey. It can be transported externally by the V-22 some 288 miles "in good weather," the Navy says.

The issue could come during a combat operation when replacement engines might need to be transported to carriers quickly. The primary issue with external carriage by the V-22 is in that rotor wash and heat generated by the engines could be dangerous to deck crew attempting to attach slings to the engine crates while the aircraft hovers over the deck. Add to that the fact that the Navy has no V-22's ... they all belong to the Marines ... and has no plans to order any.


F-35C File Photo

The Navy says the engine module and transport container weighs 9,400 pounds, which makes them too heavy to transfer to and from a supply ship while underway. The newer Gerald R. Ford-class carriers would be able to handle the load, but only one is expected to be operational when the first F-35 squadrons deploy between 2015 and 2018.

Still, the issue with the F135 engine won't bolster the fortunes of the alternate F136 engine also under development. A Navy spokeswoman said the alternate engine would have similar transportability issues.

FMI: www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC