NTSB Issues Probable Cause In Pitts S1-T Bailout | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Sep 16, 2005

NTSB Issues Probable Cause In Pitts S1-T Bailout

The NTSB has published a probable cause in the loss of a Pitts S1-T (file photo below) that impacted the ground in Southern California after its pilot could not affect a spin recovery, and bailed out... successfully, albeit with only a five second canopy ride. Whew....

NTSB Report

On June 11, 2005, about 1700 Pacific daylight time, an Aviat Pitts S-1T experimental acrobatic airplane, N647J, impacted terrain near Fillmore, California, after the pilot was unable to recover from an intentional inverted flat spin. The owner was operating the airplane under the provisions of 14 CFR Part 91. The airline transport pilot, the sole occupant, sustained minor injuries; however, the airplane was destroyed. The local personal flight departed Camarillo Airport (CMA), Camarillo, California, about 1635, and flew to the Santa Paula acrobatic practice area. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan had been filed. The approximate coordinates of the primary wreckage were 34 degrees 23 minutes north latitude and 118 degrees 59 minutes west longitude.

The pilot submitted a written report in which he reported departing CMA and flying to the Santa Paula acrobatic practice area. After 20 minutes of practicing the International Aerobatics Club sportsman sequence, he climbed to 5,000 feet mean sea level (msl) to practice inverted flat spin entry and recovery. He raised the nose to a vertical position and then pulled the nose to about negative 20 degrees past vertical. He applied full left rudder and full forward elevator control. The airplane pitched above and below the horizon twice and then entered into a left turning inverted flat spin. After about one turn he reduced power to idle, and the nose lowered into a left turning inverted spin. The rotation of the spin rapidly increased and he applied full right rudder to stop the rotation. The airplane did approximately three fast rotations and did not respond to the pilot's control inputs. He then tried to recover by initiating the Gene Beggs method of recovery (power off, opposite rudder, let go of control stick). He had already done the first two steps of the recovery and so he only had to release the control stick. However, the airplane did not respond and the rotation appeared to increase.

The pilot initiated a bailout about 1,000 feet above ground level (agl). His parachute canopy opened successfully and he landed after approximately 5 seconds. The airplane impacted the Santa Clara riverbed about 2 miles west of Fillmore, and about 50 feet from where the pilot landed. The pilot stated that the airplane and engine had no mechanical failures or malfunctions during the flight.

The Flight Combat International Emergency Maneuver Training Program indicates that the following inverted spin recovery procedure is designed to achieve optimum anti-spin effect and is consistent with recommendations based on years of detailed spin research: power - idle, ailerons - neutral (if in doubt let go of aileron control), rudder - full opposite yaw direction, and elevator - aft through neutral. Hold these inputs until yaw rotation stops, then neutralize rudder, apply aft elevator to climb straight ahead, and add climb power.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this accident as follows:

the pilot's failure to affect timely recovery from an intentional inverted flat spin.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC