Lawsuits Against CA Balloonists Dropped | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sun, Sep 04, 2011

Lawsuits Against CA Balloonists Dropped

But Defending Against JCM Litigation Has Closed Some Down

Hot air balloonists in California have achieved what may be a hollow victory over JCM Farming, Inc. of Solana Beach. The corporation constructed a fortified compound and erected signs warning of guard dogs and armed response to trespassers on land zoned for agricultural use.

In an apparent effort to impose its own restrictions on the use of airspace above its facility, the company filed lawsuits against hot air balloon ride providers it said were flying too low over the facility, which it described in part as "intended to provide a secure meeting place and retreat for VIPs, dignitary and other notable individuals and/or the companies they represent." The FAA twice investigated complaints, and found the balloonists were operating within the regs. Finally, after more than two years, on August 15th, the suits were dropped.

But the Desert Sun reports it's too late for many of the defendants, whose businesses were essentially destroyed. One balloonist claims he spent $177,000 in attorney's fees. Even the FAA was added to the lawsuit by JCM, after it declared there were no violations of its rules.

Development Management Group of Palm Desert conducted a study which found that the overall economy of the Coachella Valley lost almost 95 percent of the balloon industry's $9.7 million annual contribution between its peak in the 2005-2006 season and this year, only about a third of which could be blamed on the recession.

It may be possible for the former defendants to sue JCM for damages caused to their businesses, but it's not clear any of the balloonists will open that door to more unknown legal costs.

FMI: www.mydesert.com/article/20110831/NEWS01/108310312/Balloon-case-reveals-expense-inequity-civil-lawsuits

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.01.24): Say Altitude

Say Altitude Used by ATC to ascertain an aircraft's specific altitude/flight level. When the aircraft is climbing or descending, the pilot should state the indicated altitude round>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.01.24)

Aero Linx: European Air Law Association (EALA) EALA was established in 1988 with the aim to promote the study of European air law and to provide an open forum for those with an int>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Korean War Hero Twice Reborn

From 2023 (YouTube Version): The Life, Death, Life, Death, and Life of a Glorious Warbird In 1981, business-owner Jim Tobul and his father purchased a Chance-Vought F4U Corsair. Mo>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC