Yet Another MU-2 Down, 2 POB Lost | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI-

Airborne Unlimited-

AMA Drone Report-

Airborne Unlimited-

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 03.12.18

Airborne-UnManned 03.13.18

Airborne 03.14.18

AMA Drone Report 03.15.18

Airborne 03.16.18


Airborne 03.12.18

Airborne-UnManned 03.13.18

Airborne 03.14.18

AMA Drone Report 03.15.18

Airborne 03.16.18


Fri, Aug 25, 2006

Yet Another MU-2 Down, 2 POB Lost

Highly Capable Aircraft Design Continues to Rack Up A Disproportionate Amount of Accidents

ANN has learned of yet another tragic MU-2 accident that occurred mid-day, Friday, in an area of IFR weather, North of Daytona Beach, FL. The second MU-2 accident in FL, in as many months, this aircraft went down just 5 NM NW of Ormond Beach where local conditions consisted of rain showers and areas of reduced visibility.

The aircraft impacted in a near vertical attitude in a wooded area near the St. Rt. 40 and St. Rd. 11. Two persons were confirmed as having been onboard and killed on impact.

The aircraft was enroute from Bloomington, Indiana, at 0940 EST and proceeded direct from there to the impact site at an assigned altitude of 27,000 feet. The initial destination was listed as Melbourne (for a reported fuel stop) though the final destination was reported as Eleuthera, Bahamas. No radio communication has been reported that left any evidence that the aircraft knew it had a problem prior to the accident.

The aircraft was registered as N171MA, and was a 1980 Mitsubishi MU-2B-40, powered by two TPE 331s. The aircraft owned by Drug and Laboratory Disposal, Inc., of Allegan Michigan. The company is in the hazardous waste disposal business.

The MU-2 series, certified in standard category, is well-known among industry experts and test pilots for its excellent handling characteristics and performance criteria, is also under intense scrutiny for an accident record that seems heavily out of proportion for the size of the fleet. Over 80 aircraft of about 800 airframes have been involved in fatal accidents that have killed over 250 people as of this time.

Earlier this year, the FAA completed its third attempt to find a cause for the accident rate by conducting an additional design review. For the third time in the aircraft's much-maligned history, the Mitsubishi MU-2 has received the conditional support of the Federal Aviation Administration. The FAA once again stated that enhanced training procedures are the answer to reducing accidents in the speedy twin-turboprop.

The MU-2 is "a complex aircraft requiring operational techniques not typically found in other light turboprop aircraft," the FAA said in the safety proposal. "Fully understanding the system complexity is much more critical during an emergency situation."

"An MU-2B pilot is seven times more likely to lose control and have a fatal accident during an emergency when compared to pilots flying similar types of airplanes in similar situations," the agency added.

"We don't believe there is a safety issue with the airplane itself," said FAA spokesman Les Dorr Jr. "It meets its original certification standards."

"We continue to believe that if pilots are properly trained to fly this airplane, this airplane can be flown safely," Dorr added. "We want to make sure the pilot training is standardized and mandatory."

The agency stopped short of recommending a type-rating for the aircraft -- something that the airplane's manufacturer has supported.

A number of people have attempted to paint the aircraft as dangerous, including one Colorado legislator who made an emotional but factually insupportable attempt to get the aircraft restricted or grounded. Colorado congressman Tom Tancredo insisted that the only way to solve the MU-2's problems is to 'ground the aircraft.'

"Additional training for pilots is helpful, but is not a sufficient solution given the MU-2's crash statistics," Tancredo said in a statement quoted by the Rocky Mountain News. "Grounding the aircraft remains the optimum solution, but this is a good first step for the FAA, who, like a recovering alcoholic, has taken the first step of admitting that there is a problem."

ANN will keep an eye on this story and present more details as they become available.



More News

AMA Drone Report 03.15.18: Penguins and Drones, FPV Flying, NASA Armstrong

Also: Drone Suspected In Wildfire, UAV Airspace Integration, Longest UAV Urban Pkg Delivery, Drone Locates Child For the past 40 years, the total number of Adélie Penguins, >[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 03.13.18: FAA Message, Drone Waiver, NASA Armstrong

Also: Drone Suspected In Wildfire, DroneShield, Moore County Sheriff, Camcopter S-100 Contract During the third annual FAA UAS Symposium, cosponsored by AUVSI, FAA officials said r>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (03.18.18)

“SUU’s Aviation courses include scenario-based training that prepares both instructors and students to aid in these kinds of searches. There is no better training for o>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (03.18.18)

Aero Linx: South Carolina Aviation Safety Council (SCASC) The stated mission of the SCASC is to promote and improve positive attitudes and behaviors towards all areas of aviation s>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (03.18.18): Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA)

Minimum Vectoring Altitude (MVA) The lowest MSL altitude at which an IFR aircraft will be vectored by a radar controller, except as otherwise authorized for radar approaches, depar>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus





© 2007 - 2018 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC