Editorial Board Accuses FAA, Air Canada Of Hindering KSFO Investigation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Aug 23, 2017

Editorial Board Accuses FAA, Air Canada Of Hindering KSFO Investigation

Paper Says Delays Caused Key Evidence To Be Lost

The editorial board of the East Bay Times newspaper has written a piece in which they accuse the FAA and Air Canada of dragging their feet in the investigation of an incident July 7 at San Francisco International Airport (KSFO). An Air Canada A320 lined up to land on a taxiway where four aircraft were lined up waiting for takeoff, and initiated a go-around below 60 feet of altitude, according to the NTSB's preliminary report.

But the editorial board says that Air Canada and the FAA have slowed the pace of the investigation, which has led to the cockpit voice recorder data to be erased. They also say that the Canadian pilots were never tested for drugs and alcohol, and conclude that it all points to a "bureaucratic cover-up that conveniently protects the federal agency and the airline involved."

According to the editorial, the FAA only required one controller to be on duty at the time that the incident occurred, and that the agency did not notify the NTSB about the incident until more than 24 hours after it happened. That allowed Air Canada to operate the aircraft three more times before the investigation began, and the subsequent flights caused the Cockpit Voice Recorder to overwrite the recordings made during the incident flight multiple times.

The board says Air Canada refuses to answer questions about the investigation, the FAA will not explain why it took more than a day to report the incident, and the NTSB says that federal rules do not require such notification because there was no actual collision.

The board says that former NTSB chairman Jim Hall told a reporter for the paper that the investigation should have begun immediately, due to the potential for disaster caused by the mistake.

(NTSB image from file)

FMI: Full Editorial

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC