NTSB Revisits 'Child In Lap' Debate | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, Sep 08, 2010

NTSB Revisits 'Child In Lap' Debate

2009 Accident In Montana Fatally Injured 7 Children

The NTSB is once again asking the FAA to require all passengers, even those under 2 years of age, to have their own seats and seat belts. The recommendation follows a 2009 accident in which 14 people, including seven children, were fatally injured when the Pilatus PC-12 in which they were traveling went down in Montana.

The aircraft was taking members of three families to a ski vacation in Bozeman, MT, but diverted to Butte for unknown reasons. It went down in a cemetery adjacent to the city's airport. The NTSB said several of the children were found "far" from the wreckage of the aircraft, suggesting they were not properly restrained in individual seats.

Nora Marshall is chief of NTSB survival factors in aviation safety. She told The Associated Press "We strongly believe one seat, one person." The board has been making similar recommendations to the FAA for two decades, and an FAA spokeswoman said the agency will take the most recent recommendation under advisement, but has no rules changes in the works at this time.

The NTSB admits that the severity of the crash made it unlikely that anyone would have survived regardless of seat belts. But its most recent recommendation says the accident renews the boards longstanding concerns about restraints.

Under current rules, an adult may hold a child under 2 years of age on his or her lap during takeoff, landing, or turbulence. The FAA agrees that putting the child in an individual seat with its own seat belts would be safer, but says it does not want to require families to pay for the additional seat or push them onto the highways for their travel, which FAA spokeswoman Alison Duquestte says is less safe.

The NTSB disagrees with that assessment. A study put together by the Board indicates there is no "clearly defined relationship between diversion from air travel and highway accidents or injury."

FMI: www.ntsb.gov, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.30.24)

Aero Linx: Malibu M-Class Owners and Pilots Association (MMOPA) The Piper M-Class Owners & Pilots Association (PMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interest>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC