Aaliyah Accident Spawns Lawsuits | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, May 15, 2002

Aaliyah Accident Spawns Lawsuits

Overloaded, Probably Out of CG: C-402 Didn't Have a Chance

Sometimes, it's a good thing there are lawyers. As the August crash of the C-402B that killed 22-year-old singer and movie actress Aaliyah and some of her entourage comes more to light, several "things that were wrong" have come to light.
Ordinarily scared away by bright lights, this time, attorneys have come to the front, and are representing the families of the singer herself, as well as families of two other crash victims.
The plaintiffs are going after everybody in sight, of course, including some whose connection to the accident is more closely related to the depth of their pockets, than to any involvement in the bad decisions that apparently led to the terrible event itself.
Various charges of recklessness and negligence are being hurled against Virgin Records and other video production companies; along with those pockets, additional suits have been slapped on Blackhawk International Airways, the rarely-seen Part 135 charter that ran the flight and hired the pilot, just days before the accident.
Diane and Michael Haughton, Aaliyah's parents, say that the "dangerous and unsafe configuration" of the airplane caused the crash.
Among things that are sure to come up at trial will be evidence that led to the NTSB's findings: "The total weight of the luggage, fuel on board at the time of the accident, plus the weight of the passengers showed that the total gross weight of the airplane was substantially exceeded. Preliminary center of gravity calculations showed that the center of gravity was significantly outside the flight envelope past the aft center of gravity... Preliminary information indicated that the pilot was not approved to act as pilot-in-command in the accident aircraft under 14 CFR Part 135... The complete maintenance history of the airplane is unknown."

FMI: http://www.ntsb.gov/ntsb/brief2.asp?ev_id=20010907X01905&ntsbno=MIA01RA225&akey=1

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.30.24)

Aero Linx: Malibu M-Class Owners and Pilots Association (MMOPA) The Piper M-Class Owners & Pilots Association (PMOPA) is a not-for-profit organization dedicated to the interest>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC