Honolulu Aerial Advertising Ban Contested | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Nov 29, 2005

Honolulu Aerial Advertising Ban Contested

Pro-Life Group Cites First Amendment Rights

A 9th Circuit Federal Appeals Court panel is considering a case over a 2002 city ban on aerial banner advertising, after an anti-abortion group questioned the legitimacy of such a ban under the group's First Amendment rights. At issue is the right of the state to grant counties the authority to govern what is displayed within their airspace.

Robert Muise, attorney for the California-based Center for Bio-Ethical Reform, says the ban violates federal law and infringes on the group's First Amendment right of free expression. The group is asking to be allowed to fly aerial banners depicting aborted human fetuses above Honolulu beaches.

Current regulations give Hawaiian counties the authority to ban displays in airspace or waters beyond county boundaries if they are visible from any public place. A federal judge upheld the city's ban last November, and Governor Linda Lingle bolstered the bill further in July by signing the bill in question, giving counties the authority to ban displays in airspace, or waters beyond county boundaries, if they are visible from any public place.

Federal law allows such advertising, although up until 2002 the FAA also stated as a provision that planes flying lower than 1,000 feet AGL must "understand and obey local and state ordinances that may prohibit or restrict banner tow operations" -- a provision that was cited in the original ruling.

After the ruling was made, the FAA removed the provision -- as the agency "wanted to make it perfectly clear that the FAA still retained sole authority over airspace," according to an FAA spokesman.

According to Muise, the group has flown such banners above 19 states, and Honolulu is the only city that prohibits the activities. Muise maintains that the way the law is currently written -- with the original provision struck -- the federal government has final say over what can be displayed.

City officials have stated if the ban is overruled in the courts, they will seek federal legislation to keep the skies over Honolulu free of "offensive" images.

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC