GA Wins One... Massachusetts Aircraft Owner Gets $26,000 Tax Refund | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Fri, Apr 29, 2011

GA Wins One... Massachusetts Aircraft Owner Gets $26,000 Tax Refund

Maine Supreme Court Ruled He Was Not Subject To "Use Tax"

The state of Maine had sent Steve Kahn of Bedford, MA a bill for $26,000 in taxes they said he owed on an airplane he flew in the state in 2002 and 2003. This week, the Maine Supreme Court ruled that he should not have been sent that bill, and ordered the Maine Revenue Service to refund the money.

Maine charges a five percent "use tax" to non-residents who bring an airplane to the state within the first year of ownership. But in a 7-2 decision, the state's high court said that the "6-7 percent of the time" the plane was in Maine did not justify charging Kahn the tax. The ruling means other aircraft owners may seek refunds on taxes they were charged when they brought their aircraft to Maine for business or personal travel. When Kahn was in Maine, the law did not stipulate how long an aircraft had to be in the state for it to be assessed the tax, according to a report in the Portland Press Herald. The law is an attempt to capture revenue from aircraft owners who do not pay state sales tax on their airplanes, and can apply to other goods and services. The law has since been changed to allow visits to the state of up to 20 days before the tax is levied.

Kahn had been in Maine at his vacation home, and participating in the Angel Flight program transporting patients from rural Maine to hospitals in Boston. He called the refund a "moral victory," saying he didn't think he would ever see the money again. Kahn's attorney said the court was drawing a line by ruling in favor of Kahn, but not saying where that line is.

That's because a Florida businessman also represented by the attorney, who was assessed a $117,000 tax bill for keeping his airplane in Maine for 156 days was not so lucky. The court ruled that owner would not be receiving a refund on the use tax.

FMI: www.state.me.us/revenue/

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC