AOPA Files Formal Complaint Against Lowering Maine MOA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Mon, Jul 16, 2007

AOPA Files Formal Complaint Against Lowering Maine MOA

Changes Would Reduce Floor From 7,000' To 500'

The Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association (AOPA) tells ANN it filed formal comments to the military and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) recently, opposing proposed changes to the Condor military operations area (MOA) near Sugarloaf Mountain, ME.

"Placing high speed, low altitude military aircraft into airspace that is regularly occupied by slower moving, less equipped general aviation (GA) aircraft increases the potential for mid-air collisions," wrote Pete Lehmann, AOPA government analyst, in a letter to FAA.

According to AOPA, the military training airspace currently begins at 7,000 feet, but the proposal from the Massachusetts Air National Guard would lower the floor of that airspace to 500 feet. Air traffic controllers from Boston Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) have stated that radar coverage and communications with aircraft -- both military and civilian -- are intermittent to non-existent below 7,000 feet in the footprint of the Condor MOA due to radar limitations, thus increasing the safety risk.

In its letter to the Air National Guard, AOPA requested that the military conduct an environmental impact study before implementing the proposed airspace changes. In addition, AOPA suggested that the military review the special use airspace in the Northeast and use it more effectively, to avoid having to create new airspace.

"Adirondack Special Use Airspace (SUA) could be used in lieu of establishing a new MOA," wrote Lehmann to the Air National Guard.

The military has extended the public comment period for environmental assessment comments to August 15, 2007. Comments may be submitted to: LTC Landon Jones, Air National Guard Readiness Center, Chief, Environmental Planning Branch, NGB/A7CVP, 3500 Fetchet Avenue, Andrews AFB, MD, 20762-5157.

The comment period for the aeronautical study comments ended on July 15, 2007.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC