Foam Didn't Concern Columbia Crew | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jul 02, 2003

Foam Didn't Concern Columbia Crew

They Were Aware of Foam, Not of Any Danger

"Experts have reviewed the high speed photography and there is no concern for RCC or tile damage. We have seen the same phenomenon on several other flights and there is absolutely no concern for entry. That is all for now. It's a pleasure working with you every day."

That's one e-mail that Columbia's commander, Rick D. Husband, and pilot, William C. McCool (pictured) were happy to have received during the doomed shuttle's flight. It was written as part of then-private correspondence, by flight director "Steve" Stich. NASA explains that the correspondence wasn't "official."

The pilots liked it, though. Rick Husband replied two days later, again on a "personal" level, "Thanks a million, Steve! And thanks for the great work on your part."

Regardless Stich's happy note, NASA has since revealed that there was an ongoing debate on the ground, as to whether the foam collision could have precipitated a calamity.

The consensus was that, while the possibility was there, previous similar-looking contacts produced only minor damage; and certainly, the mission and the crew were not in any danger.

Later, NASA as much as said that, even if catastrophic damage had been suspected (it was not), there was little that could have been done, on that mission, to save the crew.

Later, NASA said that, had they really thought the safety of the crew were in danger, there might have been some herculean efforts that could have been employed. Some of those possible efforts are now being explored, as backups for future shuttle missions.

Columbia disintegrated February 1, 2003, on re-entry, at about 13,000 miles per hour, over Texas. All seven aboard were killed. Many e-mails, including previously-private correspondence, have been released to the site below.

FMI: www.jsc.nasa.gov/news/columbia/107_emails/foamemails.doc; www.caib.us

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC