Tue, Jul 21, 2009
Reducing Emphasis On Blame In Controller Errors
The FAA says it has taken another step toward a new safety
culture by reducing the emphasis on blame in the reporting of
operational errors by air traffic controllers.
"We're moving away from a culture of blame and punishment," said
FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt. "It's important to note that
controllers remain accountable for their actions, but we're moving
toward a new era that focuses on why these events occur and what
can be done to prevent them."
Effective immediately, the names of controllers will not be
included in reports sent to FAA headquarters on operational errors,
which occur when the proper distance between aircraft is not
maintained. The controller's identity will be known at the facility
where the event took place. Necessary training will be conducted
and disciplinary action taken, if appropriate. Both will be
recorded in the controller's record. Removing names on the official
report will allow investigators to focus on what happened rather
than who was at fault.
"We need quality information in order to identify problems and
learn from incidents before they become accidents," Babbitt said.
"The best sources of that information are our front-line employees.
Our success depends on their willingness to identify safety
concerns."
In order to avoid disrupting operations, controllers will not be
automatically removed from their position following an operational
error unless it is deemed necessary to remove them. Another change
designed to avoid disruptions allows reports to be filed by the
close of the next business day unless the operational error is
significant. Reports previously had to be filed within four
hours.
This action is part of the transition to the FAA's new
non-punitive reporting system for controllers. The Air Traffic
Safety Action Program (ATSAP), which now covers one-third of the
country, allows controllers and other employees to report safety
problems without fear of punishment unless the incident is
deliberate or criminal in nature. Today's change in the reporting
requirements for operational errors provides for a more seamless
transition as ATSAP is rolled out to the entire country.
The reporting changes do not alter the investigation and
analysis of operational errors. They also do not change the
requirements for addressing the causal and contributing factors to
those events.
More News
Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]
Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]
Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]