Columbia Disaster Came Down To A Single Conversation | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On ANN

ADR 02.20.17

Airborne 02.20.17

Airborne 02.21.17

Airborne 02.22.17

Airborne 02.23.17

Airborne 02.17.17

Airborne-HD On YouTube

ADR 02.20.17

Airborne 02.20.17

Airborne 02.21.17

Airborne 02.22.17

Airborne 02.23.17

Airborne 02.17.17

Wed, Jul 23, 2003

Columbia Disaster Came Down To A Single Conversation

Yet, NASA Manager Defends Her Decision

Seldom in the course of history is a single, heartwrenching tragedy so solidly linked to a precipitating moment.

Yet, right there on audio tape, recorded during a nationwide conference call, is the voice of Linda Ham (right), a shuttle manager at the Johnson Space Center in Houston (TX):

"(T)he material properties and density of the foam wouldn't do any damage," she says in a conversation with engineer Don McCormick.

With that turn of words, Columbia was doomed, five days after a chunk of insulating foam from the orbiter's external fuel tank slammed into the shuttle's left wing leading edge. That strike, according to preliminary information from the Columbia Accident Investigation Board, most likely allowed superheated gasses to enter the wing structure, leading to the shuttle's disintegration as it re-entered Earth's atmosphere.

"Really, I don't think there is much we can do," Ham said in the January 21st conference call. "It's not really a factor during the flight because there isn't much we can do about it."

Judgement Day

Tuesday, a tearful Linda Ham speculated for reporters in Houston on what might have been. "We were all trying to do the right thing. All along, we were basing our decisions on the best information that we had at the time," she said. "Nobody wanted to do any harm to anyone. Obviously, nobody wants to hurt the crew. These people are our friends. They're our neighbors. We run with them, work out in the gym with them. My husband is an astronaut. I don't believe anyone is at fault for this."

Ham acknowledged she could have ordered American spy satellites to take detailed photos of the possible damage to Columbia's left wing.

But she didn't. Why?

She says none of the engineers who wanted the photos actually approached her for them. On the conference call tape, Don McCormick mentions in passing a request from other NASA and Boeing engineers for more "parametric" data on the possible wing damage. But Ham brushed it off in the conference call. "I really can't find the source (of the request), so I don't think we need to pursue this."

It was Ham's first public statement since the February 1st Columbia tragedy. At one point, she choked up, borrowing a handkerchief to wipe away her tears.

Gallantly, Ham took responsibility Tuesday for the decision to disregard possible damage to Columbia's wing. "We all heard the discussions," she said. "None of us felt that the analysis (of the danger posed by the foam debris strike) was faulty. It ended that day. It never came up again. Never. Not in a hallway, not in the mission management team."

Had They Known...

It did come up again, but long after it was too late. The CAIB has found that block of foam, twice the size and twice the weight of foam debris that struck the underside of Atlantis's wing in October, 2002, almost certainly punched a sizeable hole in Columbia's wing. Even worse in terms of second-guessing, CAIB Chairman Harold Gehman (Admiral, USN, ret.) contradicted statements made on the day of the crash from then-shuttle program manager Ron Dittemore. He told reporters there was absolutely nothing that could have been done, even if NASA had known there was a potentially fatal error aboard the orbiter. In May, Gehman said Atlantis could almost certainly have been launched in time to effect a rescue mission.

If only Ham, McCormick, Dittemore and others on that conference call had known then, what they know now...

FMI: www.caib.us

Advertisement

More News

Infamous RV-10 Lawsuit Against Van's Aircraft Dismissed

Years of Wasted Effort, Resources, and Worry Signal Ongoing Defects In US Tort Law When the news first came out, in 2015, that Van's Aircraft was sued for a considerable amount of >[...]

Airborne 02.22.17: CAF Dixie Wing P-63A, AF1 Price Cut, SLS Manned Flt?

Also: Drone Light Show, Remotely Piloted Helos, TFR Busts, Gulfstream, XTI Aircraft, CA Airlines, Icelandair After more than 40 years since it’s last flight, the Commemorativ>[...]

AMA Drone Report 02.20.17: DJI & AMA Team Up, MultiGP, Drone Advisory Committee

Also: Another Dumb FL Drone Law, AMA Expo East!, Spaceport America Drone Summit DJI and AMA have launched a joint program to promote safe and responsible drone operations, train pu>[...]

Airborne 02.21.17: NASA 'Space Poop' Challenge, Drone Advisory, Boeing

Also: Alphabet Balloons, Aero-Calendar, DJI-AMA, Solar Research, Dreamliners, F-35, ALPA NASA Johnson Space Center, in partnership with NASA Tournament Lab and online crowdsourcing>[...]

GA Aircraft Shipments And Billings Down Almost Across The Board

Only Uptick Was In Turboprop Airplanes, Turbine Helicopters Hit Hard The news is pretty much all bad, and some of it is really bad, in the GAMA 2016 year-end report of aircraft shi>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC