Airport Opponents Target Scottsdale (AZ) | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 09.21.17

Airborne 09.18.17

Airborne 09.19.17

Airborne 09.20.17

Airborne 09.21.17

Airborne 09.22.17

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 09.21.17

Airborne 09.18.17

Airborne 09.19.17

Airborne 09.20.17

Airborne 09.21.17

Airborne 09.22.17

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17

NEW!!! 2017 AirVenture Innovation Preview -- YouTube Presentation / Vimeo Presentation

Fri, Nov 14, 2003

Airport Opponents Target Scottsdale (AZ)

Just When You Thought It Was Safe To Go To The Airport

John Hoeppner thinks he can do it. He tells the Arizona Republic the "ground is fertile" for a public vote to close Scottsdale Airport (AZ). Just when you were ready to breathe a big sigh of relief after voters overwhelmingly decided to keep Albert Whitted Airport in St. Petersburg (FL), another battle looms on the horizon.

Hoeppner is the former leader of Quiet Skies, an anti-airport organization that sued the FAA (unsucessfully) over the Northwest 2000 Plan. The plan rerouted commercial air traffic into and out of Phoenix Sky Harbor. He's now lining up with another airport opponent, Nick Luongo of Scottsdale, who says he's tired of trying to work with the city council on aircraft noise issues and now wants the voters to decide -- should Scottsdale Airport be forever closed?

"If the right people get involved in this thing, then the Scottsdale council will have something to contend with," said Hoeppner.

But not everyone agrees. Scottsdale Councilman Bob Littlefield says, "This is the same guy who said they'd win the lawsuit (over Northwest 2000) too. Closing the airport is nuts. And Littlefield points to the facts.

About 250,000 people live in Scottsdale. Of those, only 272 filed aircraft noise complaints last year.  But it's not that easy. Hoeppner says a lot of the same people involved in the Northwest 2000 suit are circulating a petition to close the Scottsdale Airport. The two issues are related. Luongo says noise from aircraft wasn't a problem until the Northwest 2000 plan was implemented. Under the plan, corporate jets have been forced to fly lower in certain areas to accomodate the commercial traffic into and out of Sky Harbor.

"That's a crock," says Littlefield, in an interview with the Republic. "If we get rid of the corporate jets, he'd be complaining about the Cessna 172s."

But Luongo goes even further. He says his life is threatened by the corporate jets flying overhead. He lives about two miles south of the airport. "It's just a matter of time before a plane crashes on someone," he says. Luongo is circulating a petition with 16 reasons why the Scottsdale Airport should be shut down.

Luongo tries to make the argument that closing the airport would stimulate the economy. He says the surrounding business development, the Scottsdale Air Park, could be greatly expanded to cover the 226 acres now used for air operations. But aviation advocates say it isn't so.

Craig Morningstar is one of the founders of AZSNAP (Arizona Scottsdale Network Air Park). He says a lot of the corporations around the airport are there only because they can get in and out a lot faster than if they based their aircraft at Sky Harbor. If the airport goes, he says, then so goes the Air Park and with it, 40,000 jobs. Sure, things might be a bit quieter. Morningstar says the economic engine of Scottsdale would sputter and die.

There's another catch: Scottsdale could lose the Air Park altogether because of a deal made with the Seventh Day Adventist Church 40 years ago. The church sold the airport property to Scottsdale for $3 million back in 1963, on the condition that it be used as an airport and the church would always have access to the field. Break those conditions and the airport could revert back to the church. Then, as with Albert Whitted in Florida, airport opponents would have to deal with the state and the FAA, both of which have contributed money to the development and maintenance of Scottsdale Airport.

FMI: www.azsnap.com

Advertisement

More News

AMA Drone Report 09.14.17: MultiGP NatÂ’l Championship, GDU O2, ICAO Registration

Also: AMA Monitoring Volunteer Drones, Aerix DaVinci, FAA ReAuthorization, TobyRich, ADR Test Pilots The 2017 MultiGP National Drone Racing Championship are being held now through >[...]

RFP: ANN Seeking New Site/Facility For Major Studio Upgrade

It's Official: Aggressive Upgrades For New Airborne Programs WILL Require New Digs It's been in development for years, but we're getting to a point where we think we can pull off s>[...]

Airborne 09.19.17: Avro Arrow, Virgin Orbit, No Pot Delivery By Drone

Also: NFlightMic Debut, Natl Av Hall Of Fame, Aero-Calendar, MD v FAA, Med Drone Transport, Ryanair, 'Black Sheep' Kraken Sonar Systems, working with OEX Recovery Group, has discov>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 09.19.17: FAA OKs FL Drone Ops, ICAO Registry?, No Pot Drones

Also: FAA Reauthorization, Medical Drone Transport, USMC Quadcopters, Canister Launched UAS, Atlas Dynamics Airborne, primarily based in Jacksonville, FL is starting to recover fro>[...]

Airborne 09.20.17: Apollo 11 Tour, ADS-B Upgrades, FL Drones

Also: Sebring Airport, DeLand SportAv Showcase, MH-139, Winged-S Rescue Award, Next AF1, EC-130H Update, SDASM HOF The Apollo 11 command module Columbia—the only portion of t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC