EAA Comments On Piper Airworthiness Directive | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Sun, Jun 14, 2020

EAA Comments On Piper Airworthiness Directive

The SNPRM Put Forth By The FAA Added Three Models And Removed Five

As previously reported by ANN, the FAA announced changes to a proposed airworthiness directive regarding certain models of Piper PA-28 and PA-32 in response to comments made by many GA stakeholders.

The proposed AD, which addressed wing spar issues following a tragic accident at Embry Riddle Aeronautical University, was first promulgated in December 2018. EAA filed comments expressing concerns that the AD was overly broad, required more nuance in its formula to determine whether eddy current inspections were necessary, and underestimated the cost of those inspections.

EAA requested that the agency work with Piper to determine which aircraft, both in terms of model numbers and individual aircraft service records, would necessitate inspection. The supplemental notice of proposed rulemaking put forth by the FAA added three models and removed five, which ultimately removed roughly 8,800 total airframes from the original group of more than 20,000, and points to a Piper service bulletin for the eddy current inspection procedures.

Additionally, the FAA clarified that only 100-hour inspections done to comply with 14 CFR 91.409(b) will count toward determining which aircraft have enough service hours to mandate inspection. Previously, there was some question if owners and operators who were not mandated to undergo 100-hour inspections but who did anyway would be subject to these mandatory inspections, even if they did not use their aircraft for flight instruction or for-hire carrying operations. The cost estimate for the service was also adjusted from $85 an hour to a more realistic total of $600. Both of these were specific concerns raised in EAA's comments.

While EAA always acknowledged the seriousness of potential wing spar failures, any action to address them needs to be correctly targeted and well-considered. The SNPRM is open for comments until July 20, 2020, and EAA is carefully analyzing it and will comment as is appropriate.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.eaa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC