Lewiston, ME Immune From Lawsuit In Plane Crash Involving Students | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jun 07, 2010

Lewiston, ME Immune From Lawsuit In Plane Crash Involving Students

High Court Determines City Is Not Responsible For Actions Of Contractor

The Maine Supreme Judicial Court has ruled that the city of Lewiston is immune from a lawsuit stemming from an airplane accident in which three high school students were fatally injured.

The accident occurred in 2006 during a summer camp for students in the Lewiston High School Junior ROTC program. The three students were participating in an orientation flight when it impacted terrain on Barker Mountain, killing the students and the pilot. The NTSB determined the probable cause of the accident was pilot error, and another student who had flown with the pilot said he had a history of "showing off" and performing dangerous maneuvers.

Maine Public Broadcasting reports that the families of the students reached settlements with Twin Cities Air Services, which owned the airplane and provided the pilot. But they had also filed a wrongful death suit against the school district and the city, contending that they had knowledge that the situation would be dangerous and did not act on that knowledge.

The city argued that Twin Cities Air Services made the choice of pilot, and that flying the airplanes was the company's responsibility, but a superior court judge ruled last year that the city was not immune from the suit despite a Maine law that does not hold government entities responsible for the actions of independent contractors.

The Main Supreme Judicial Court's 4-3 decision agrees with the city of Lewiston that it is immune under the Tort Claims Act. But in the dissent, three justices said that the immunity should not apply because the city was "using" the airplane when the accident occurred.

FMI: www.courts.state.me.us/maine_courts/supreme/index.shtml

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC