What Price, Dreamliner? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** Airborne 04.18.14--CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version--Airborne 04.18.14 **
** Airborne 04.16.14--CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version--Airborne 04.16.14 **
** Airborne 04.14.14--CLICK HERE! ** HD iPad-Friendly Version--Airborne 04.14.14 **

Mon, Nov 17, 2003

What Price, Dreamliner?

Washington State Questions The Cost Of Attracting Boeing's New 7E7 Plant

Every time you go to the store or plan a purchase for your company or weigh the simple cost of getting from one place to another, you have to make a decision. Is it worth the investment? What's my return?

Folks in Washington state are asking those questions now regarding concessions demanded by Boeing. In return, Washington could land a new Boeing plant that will make 7E7 Dreamliners. But it'll cost the taxpayers an estimated $3.5 billion in revenue the state would receive if it didn't make the concessions Boeing wants.

The Seattle Times reports all but $200,000 of that would come in concessions on the state's Business and Occupancy Tax, much loathed by companies that have facilities in Washington. The cut in B&O taxes wouldn't affect just the new 7E7 assembly plant. It would be applied to Boeing assets statewide.

"We wanted to use the one advantage we have in this game — the fact that Boeing already has a large footprint here," said Sheila Martin, the governor's executive assistant for economic development. "That gives us a lot of leverage over other states."

Washington is also offering Boeing the chance to build its new 7E7 facility without being burdened by property taxes. The company would still have to pay property taxes, but the B&O cut would offset those payments.

"If Boeing does go with Washington, they're basically guaranteed to not have any local property-tax disputes," Seattle tax attorney Norm Bruns said. "In the end, they won't really care what they're assessed at by the local assessor, because whatever it is they get a full B&O credit."

That's huge for Boeing. Unlike other states, Washington taxes the materials and services used to piece together a product. A recent study led by Bill Gates, Sr., shows aerospace, the backbone of the Washington state economy, is overburdened by the B&O tax. Dumping that for all Boeing facilities could indeed prove an offer Boeing just can't refuse.

FMI: www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (04.20.14)

"The discovery of Kepler-186f is a significant step toward finding worlds like our planet Earth. Future NASA missions, like the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite and the James >[...]

Skydive Jersey Announces Shuttle Service For 2014 Season

Removes 'Getting To The Airport' As An Excuse To Not Go Skydiving So imagine it's a beautiful day to go jump out of an airplane in the greater New York City area, but you just don'>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.14): Ground Stop

Ground Stop Ground Stops are implemented for a number of reasons. The most common reasons are: 1) To control air traffic volume to airports when the projected traffic demand is exp>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.20.14)

Aero Linx: The Australian Parachute Federation The Australian Parachute Federation exists to administer and represent Australian Sport Parachuting. This is achieved by promoting an>[...]

ANN FAQ: Getting The Most Out Of ANN's Newsletters

ANN goes through a lot of trouble to make the graphics flashy and cool and an integral part of the story. But let's face it, they're bandwidth-intensive. So here are a couple of th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2014 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC