Calls FAA Funding Plans "Completely Unacceptable"
A key US senator says the nearly fourfold increase in general
aviation fuel taxes proposed by the Federal Aviation Administration
(FAA) is "completely unacceptable," according to the Aircraft
Owners and Pilots Association. AOPA has adamantly opposed the user
fees and increase in fuel taxes included in FAA's plan.
"I know what is behind it; this attitude that there are so few
pilots you can get away with anything," said Oklahoma Senator James
M. Inhofe before the Senate Commerce aviation subcommittee last
week.
Sen. Inhofe, a passionate general aviation (GA) pilot and AOPA
member, is not a member of the Commerce Committee. AOPA states for
Inhofe to go into the committee hearing room and plead for GA,
meant he felt so strongly about the issue that he was willing to do
what it took to make his point.
“The United States has the safest and most efficient air
transportation system in the world," said Inhofe. "Our aviation
system is second to none and is not broken.
"Congress is being asked to dismantle the time-tested aviation
financing system for reasons that are not entirely clear to me," he
continued. “Our aviation infrastructure is inherently
governmental and thus maintaining the historical level of general
fund contributions to the system is critical, and congressional
oversight is essential."
AOPA President Phil Boyer spoke with Sen. Inhofe as he and his
staff were developing his statement. "One of the key points that he
made at the hearing was how important it is to take user fees off
the table. That way we can have a meaningful debate about the
future of FAA funding," Boyer said.
An active commercial, instrument-rated pilot with more than 50
years flying experience, Inhofe has served on congressional
committees that have drafted previous FAA funding legislation. He
used GA extensively as a small businessman, and continues to fly
himself regularly to meet his constituents and serve his state.
He pointed out that GA contributes more than $100 billion
annually to the economy, and that it is one of the few US-based
industries making a positive contribution to the country’s
balance of trade.
"Why we would consider destroying that is beyond my
understanding," said Inhofe, "but make no mistake, if this proposal
is adopted, there will be a dramatic and immediate negative effect
on general aviation."