Arguments Heard In Virginia 'Strip Protest' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

** Airborne 11.24.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.24.14 **
** Airborne 11.21.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.21.14 **
** Airborne 11.19.14 ** HD iPad-Friendly -- Airborne 11.19.14 **

Sat, Aug 13, 2011

Arguments Heard In Virginia 'Strip Protest'

21-Year-Old Filed Suit Over His Treatment After Disrobing At Airport Checkpoint

Arguments were heard this week in the case of a lawsuit brought by a 21-year-old man who protested airport security screening by writing part of the Fourth Amendment on his body and stripping to underwear and socks in the checkpoint line at Richmond International Airport in Virginia December 30, 2011.

Aaron B. Tobey of Charlottesville, VA filed a lawsuit seeking $250,000, claiming the US Department of Homeland Security, TSA, and airport officials violated his rights under the First, Fourth, Fifth and 14th Amendments. He claims he was falsely imprisoned, maliciously prosecuted, and "humiliated and punished...in direct retaliation for his protected act of peaceful protest." Court papers add that his belongings were repeatedly searched, and that some personal effects were seized and discarded.

The Richmond Times Dispatch reports Carlotta P. Wells, an attorney for the US Department of Justice, argued Wednesday in favor of a motion to dismiss the suit, saying Tobey had made his point by removing his shirt to display words from the Fourth Amendment written on his body, but went too far when he disobeyed a command to pass through a security scanner. She asserted, "The TSA officers were clearly just following federal laws."

Anand Agneshwar, a lawyer representing Tobey, argued that his client obeyed the commands of authorities, and it was they who went too far by detaining Tobey for 90 minutes or more in handcuffs. Tobey did eventually board his flight to attend a funeral.

Henrico County authorities charged him with disorderly conduct, but later dropped the charge.

The paper reports Federal District Judge Henry E. Hudson said he hopes to rule within two weeks on the motion to dismiss, but also set a trial date of January 18, 2012 in the event the case goes forward.

FMI: Airport Security Camera Recording

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.26.14)

FAA Aviation Safety Information Analysis And Sharing System (ASIAS) The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) promotes the open exchange of safety information in order to continuou>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.26.14): Density Altitude

Pressure altitude corrected for nonstandard temperature. Density altitude is used in computing the performance of an aircraft and its engines.>[...]

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (11.26.14)

“We hope to never see an event like this again, but, we must be prepared." Source: FAA Administrator Michael Huerta, on the release of the agency's 30 report on the fire at t>[...]

ANN FAQ: It's Alive! ANN REALTIME NewsBug Headlines for YOUR Desktop!

It's For Real! ANN REALTIME NewsBug Released To ANN Readers, Worldwide For those of you using a windows PC (MAC version in the works... we promise), a new REALTIME News Service fro>[...]

Helicopters Still Flying Tourists Over Hudson River

But Activists Continue To Call For A Ban On The Flights A group of activists in New York and New Jersey are still working to have sightseeing flights over New York City and the Hud>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2014 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC