FAA Updates Rules On Biennial Flight Reviews | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Thu, Sep 19, 2013

FAA Updates Rules On Biennial Flight Reviews

Adds Exemptions For Some Pilots, Flight Instructors

The FAA posted a final rule and request for comments in the Federal Register Monday that will exempt some pilots from having to complete a biennial flight review. This rule permits an airman who passes a practical test for issuance of a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for the addition of a rating to a flight instructor certificate, a practical test for renewal of a flight instructor certificate, or a practical test for the reinstatement of a flight instructor certificate to meet the 24-calendar month flight review requirements.

This rule also clarifies that the generally applicable recent flight experience requirements do not apply to a pilot in command who is employed by a commuter or on-demand operator if the pilot in command is in compliance with the specific pilot in command qualifications and recent experience requirements for that commuter or on-demand operator.

The purpose of the flight review is to provide for a regular assessment of pilot skills and aeronautical knowledge. When the requirement was first introduced, the FAA stated that the flight review would assure that every pilot would have a qualified individual comment on his or her competency at least once every two years. The flight review also offers pilots the opportunity to design a personal currency and proficiency program in consultation with an authorized flight instructor. A flight review may have certain standard features, such as review of specific regulations and procedures; however, both the flight review and any follow-up plan for training and proficiency may be tailored to each pilot’s skill, experience, aircraft, and personal flying goals. Section 61.56 sets forth certain exceptions to the requirement for a pilot to accomplish a flight review.

Among these exceptions, a person who has, within the prescribed 24-month period, "passed a pilot proficiency check conducted by an FAA examiner, an approved pilot check airman, or a U.S. Armed Force, for a pilot certificate, rating, or operating privilege," need not accomplish the required flight review required by the FARs.

In a recent legal interpretation, the FAA concluded that a flight instructor practical test is not included in the listed exceptions because it is not a "pilot proficiency check." In this new rule, the FAA says it finds that good cause exists to amend § 61.56(d) to include successful completion of flight instructor practical tests among the exceptions to the flight review requirement. Applicants for an FAA flight instructor certificate are required to have the comprehensive knowledge and skills necessary to provide instruction to airmen seeking pilot certificates and ratings. Part 61 specifies the areas of operation in which knowledge and skill must be demonstrated by the applicant before the issuance of an FAA flight instructor certificate with the associated category and class ratings. All practical tests administered must meet the knowledge and skill standard prescribed by the corresponding Flight Instructor Practical Test Standards Book published by the FAA.

Lastly, the FAA says that it recognized that it is appropriate to amend the language in § 61.57(e) to make clear that the recent flight experience requirements of that section do not apply to a pilot in  command who is employed by the holder of an operating certificate that is conducting operations under part 121 or part 135 if the pilot in command is also in compliance with § 121.435 or § 121.436, as applicable, and § 121.439, or §§ 135.243 and 135.247, as appropriate. In making this change, the FAA says it is acting consistently with the original intent of the regulation— specifically, providing relief from redundant recency requirements.

The rule is open for comments until October 16, 2013.

FMI: Read the Rule

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.01.24): Say Altitude

Say Altitude Used by ATC to ascertain an aircraft's specific altitude/flight level. When the aircraft is climbing or descending, the pilot should state the indicated altitude round>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.01.24)

Aero Linx: European Air Law Association (EALA) EALA was established in 1988 with the aim to promote the study of European air law and to provide an open forum for those with an int>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Korean War Hero Twice Reborn

From 2023 (YouTube Version): The Life, Death, Life, Death, and Life of a Glorious Warbird In 1981, business-owner Jim Tobul and his father purchased a Chance-Vought F4U Corsair. Mo>[...]

Airborne 04.29.24: EAA B-25 Rides, Textron 2024, G700 Deliveries

Also: USCG Retires MH-65 Dolphins, Irish Aviation Authority, NATCA Warns FAA, Diamond DA42 AD This summer, history enthusiasts will have a unique opportunity to experience World Wa>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 05.02.24: Bobby Bailey, SPRG Report Cards, Skydive!

Also: WACO Kitchen Bails, French SportPlane Mfr to FL, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Innovation Preview Bobby Bailey, a bit of a fixture in sport aviation circles for his work with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC