New FAA Runway Landing Length Requirements Recommended | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Sun, Sep 03, 2006

New FAA Runway Landing Length Requirements Recommended

Proposed Rule Follows Midway Runway Overrun

Discussion of runway length has been very much in the public eye this week, but after last December's overrun accident of a Southwest 737 off a snow-filled runway, the FAA immediately went to work analyzing runway length decisions.

The National Air Transportation Association (NATA) reports the FAA conducted an internal audit into its own rules and regulations and discovered about half of all air carriers did not have formal procedures for determining safe runway length under less than ideal conditions. Those operators who did make allowances for poor runway conditions frequently had wildly varying rules.

The FAA cites as one example, the credit for the use of thrust reversers in the landing performance data was not uniformly applied and pilots may not have been aware of those differences. 

Based on its findings, the FAA intended to immediately require all part 91(K), 121, 125, and 135 turbojet operators to have procedures in place to ensure a full-stop landing with at least a 15% safety margin beyond the actual calculated landing distance. On Friday, however, the FAA agreed to hold off mandatory compliance with the proposed rule.

Sources at the NATA tell ANN the organization welcomed Friday's issuance of a Safety Alert for Operators (SAFO) titled “Landing Distance Assessment at Time of Arrival for Turbojets.”

A SAFO is considered highly recommended, but not strictly mandatory as would be an FAA regulation.

NATA states it convinced the FAA that their proposed rule was regulatory in nature and thus required to follow formal rulemaking processes which require a specific period of public comment and the issuing of a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM). 

“The association is very pleased with the FAA’s decision to issue this recommendation through a SAFO and not through inappropriate regulation by notice or OpSpec [operational specification]” said NATA President James K. Coyne. “No federal agency is above the rulemaking process and the requirements of the Administrative Procedures Act.”

FMI: www.nata.aero, More Information on FAA SAFOs

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC