Navy Says Signal Interference With Qantas Flight 'Highly Unlikely' | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Nov 17, 2008

Navy Says Signal Interference With Qantas Flight 'Highly Unlikely'

Authorities To Investigate Transmissions From Sub Base

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau said on Friday that it intends to investigate the possibility that communications signals, originating from Harold E. Holt Naval Communications Base in Western Australia, may have caused interference with flight control systems aboard a Qantas airliner last month.

Calling the idea "highly unlikely," Base Manager Russell Levien said that if signals from the Base were to blame, planes would regularly be affected by them. "We'd have planes down all around us if it was us (who caused the problem)," he said.

The incident occurred about 100 miles from Holt Naval Base, which uses very low frequency signals to communicate with US and Australian submarines in the area, The Weekend Australian said.

After reviewing transmissions on the day of the incident, Levien said he did not find anything unusual. He also checked with similar naval communication bases around the world -- including a US Naval Station at Cutler, ME -- none of which had received any reports of their transmissions interfering with aircraft.

As ANN reported, the Qantas flight was enroute from Singapore to Perth on October 7 when pilots received alarms about "some irregularity with the aircraft's elevator control system", before a 300-foot uncommanded ascent followed by an abrupt 350-foot nosedive occurred, injuring numerous passengers and crew.

Latest reports list 70 people were injured in the incident, 14 of them seriously. Initially blamed on clear air turbulence, a later theory speculated in-flight use of a lap-top computer may have interfered with the plane's flight control systems.

Further research into the cause of the incident is expected to be conducted this week at Northrop Grumman's US facilities, as experts test a component possibly at fault for sending errant signals to the plane's flight control computers.

FMI: www.qantas.com, www.atsb.gov.au

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC