AOPA To FAA: Change AC To Cover Older Planes | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Jul 06, 2005

AOPA To FAA: Change AC To Cover Older Planes

Proposed Guideline Would Cover More Than Just Part 23 Aircraft

The AOPA wants the FAA to revise a proposed advisory circular (AC) to clarify that it can be applied to all older general aviation aircraft.

The new AC would set guidelines for allowing aircraft to continue flying with known structural cracks. The AC would publicize a long-existing FAA policy that deems an aircraft is still airworthy if the crack is not in the primary structure and the airframe can still withstand the ultimate design load.

"The FAA left out the majority of older GA aircraft from this guidance document," said Luis Gutierrez, AOPA director of regulatory and certification policy. "As drafted, it only applies to Part 23-certificated aircraft. But most aircraft flying today were certificated under the old CAR 3 standards.

"It's important that the policy be applied uniformly and predictably to all aircraft in order to keep them flying safely and affordably," Gutierrez said.

AOPA also expressed concern that the proposed AC excludes previously acceptable methods used to substantiate an airplane's ability to sustain ultimate load with cracks in non-critical structure. "The removal of those options from the AC would eliminate viable alternative testing methods with demonstrated success in determining the continued safety of the airframe," said Gutierrez.

Most older aircraft have developed cracks in some structures because of the natural aging process. Although certification authorities in some other countries will ground aircraft with any cracks, the United States has taken the more reasonable position of determining if the crack poses any threat to safety

FMI: www.aopa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.25.24): Airport Rotating Beacon

Airport Rotating Beacon A visual NAVAID operated at many airports. At civil airports, alternating white and green flashes indicate the location of the airport. At military airports>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.25.24)

Aero Linx: Fly for the Culture Fly For the Culture, Inc. is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization that serves young people interested in pursuing professions in the aviation industry>[...]

Klyde Morris (04.22.24)

Klyde Is Having Some Issues Comprehending The Fed's Priorities FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC