Boston Aircraft Just Not Flying Right | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Tue, Oct 10, 2006

Boston Aircraft Just Not Flying Right

Logan Airport Departure Flights Missing Their Corridor

The FAA has released a study that confirms what many Boston anti-airport activists have long suspected --  many airplanes are not flying the noise sensitive routes they promised they would.

In a just released study, the FAA found that only 58% percent of jets taking off from Logan Airport's Runway 27 flew the flight corridor designed in a 1996 FAA ruling. The minimum requirement is 68.2% of all flights.

The Boston Globe says in the 1970s, the configuration of Runway 27 was altered and sent departing aircraft over Boston's downtown neighborhoods. Residents successfully sued and the compromise reached was the creation of a 7.5 mile long flight corridor that would minimize the noise signature of the jets.

When winds are out of the northwest, aircraft departing runway 27 head right over South Boston's Seaport District and other heavily populated urban areas.

Worst offenders, according to the report are heavy jumbo jets, who only manage to make the corridor about 40% of the time.

The determining factor seems to have nothing to do with weather conditions such as visibility or wind speed, or navigational equipment on board, or the particular airline company, or even whether  the flights were flown as military, charter, air taxi, or airline categories -- but simply which type of aircraft was being used.

The Boeing 757 is singled out as being rated far below average... no matter who flies it. This suggests that something about its climb performance may make it hard to enter the flight corridor.

The Globe says the report concludes that the FAA needs to work with airlines to determine why some of their flights are not measuring up and find ways to fix the problem.

FMI: www.massport.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC