September 11: Blame Airlines, Boeing | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Wed, Sep 10, 2003

September 11: Blame Airlines, Boeing

Somebody Died; Somebody Has to Pay!

U.S. District Judge Alvin Hellerstein said on Tuesday that he will not dismiss suits against AMR, UAL, Boeing, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, World Trade Center Properties, and others for what is allegedly their part in the September 11 terrorist attacks.

The airlines argued that the terror attacks were beyond their control (they were -- the airlines followed all federal screening rules; and then their crews gave in to the hijackers' demands, just the way the government experts told them to), and that the acts should therefore be classified as 'acts of God.' Beyond that, if government actions that followed September 11 were to be used as evidence, the terrorist attacks were 'acts of war,' also exempt from litigation.

The judge's ruling seems to support the theory that the attacks were not acts of war; and that they would have been preventable, had the airlines (and Boeing?) done something differently, yet still withing the federal rules.

The heirs of those killed in the STC and Pentagon attacks, and on Flight 93, stand to collect millions -- either on top of, or instead of, millions already pledged by the American people, and not yet used as 'administrative costs' by the charitable organizations that collected those donations.

The real question seems to be, 'should those heirs go for the big pot 'o money that's possible through litigation, or settle for the monies already available?' To be fair, the suit on Judge Hellerstein's docket was brought by ten entities who suffered property damage, and the heirs of 70 victims (of the roughly 3000 who were killed that horrible day).

FMI: www.ual.com; www.amrcorp.com; www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Unfortunate... ANN/SportPlane Resource Guide Adds To Cautionary Advisories

The Industry Continues to be Rocked By Some Questionable Operations Recent investigations and a great deal of data has resulted in ANN’s SportPlane Resource Guide’s rep>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.24): Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) An airport lighting facility providing vertical visual approach slope guidance to aircraft during approach to landing by radiating a directio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC