NASA IG Says Orion Review Board Violates Federal Laws | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Fri, May 02, 2008

NASA IG Says Orion Review Board Violates Federal Laws

Includes Employees Of Contractors Tasked With Building New Spacecraft

According to a report issued this week by NASA's Inspector General, the board established to review development and construction of the agency's upcoming Orion manned spacecraft includes six employees of companies tasked with building the capsule... a violation of both federal law, and common-sense ethics.

The board, chaired by former Skylab astronaut Ed Gibson, was established to scrutinize those very companies, reports The Associated Press. But Gibson and five other boardmembers work for NASA contractors building various components of the spacecraft.

Of the 19 members of the Orion review board, three are employed by Science Applications International Corp. (SAIC), which is tasked with building Orion test facilities. Two -- Gibson, and former NASA flight director Neil Hutchinson -- are vice presidents and stockholders.

Jack Garman, a former NASA employee and key figure with the Apollo lunar program, works for Lockheed Martin -- the prime builder of the Orion spacecraft. Two others work for contractors MEI Technologies, and Gray Research Inc.

The IG says that's a clear conflict of interest, and wants those six members suspended. But NASA replies it's not that easy, since engineers qualified to make informed decisions regarding a highly specialized spacecraft will, by definition, usually work for either the space agency, or one of its contractors.

NASA spokesman David Steitz adds this isn't the first time the agency has had to deal with such concerns... but that explanation doesn't sit well with New York University professor Paul Light, an expert on government ethics.

Light tells the AP the IG report indicates "a flagrant abuse and Congress should investigate... Not only is NASA ready to challenge the laws of physics, it appears more than willing to challenge the laws of Congress."

FMI: Read The IG's Report (.pdf)

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Flight Training 05.09.24: ERAU at AIAA, LIFT Diamond Buy, Epic A&P

Also: Vertical Flight Society, NBAA Maintenance Conference, GA Honored, AMT Scholarship For the first time, students from Embry-Riddle’s Daytona Beach, Florida, campus took t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.24): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cessna 150

(FAA) Inspector Observed That Both Fuel Tanks Were Intact And That Only A Minimal Amount Of Fuel Remained In Each Analysis: According to the pilot, approximately 8 miles from the d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.08.24)

“Pyka’s Pelican Cargo is unlike any other UAS solution on the market for contested logistics. We assessed a number of leading capabilities and concluded that the Pelica>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC