Australian Official Disputes MH370 Deliberate Ditching Theory | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, May 23, 2018

Australian Official Disputes MH370 Deliberate Ditching Theory

Search Director Says Evidence Indicates That The Airplane Was Not Being Controlled When It Impacted The Water

The Australian Transport Safety Bureau official who directed the search for Malaysian Airlines Flight MH370 says that the airliner was not under anyone's control when it impacted the Indian Ocean on March 8, 2014.

The Voice of America reports that search Director Peter Foley told an Australian Senate Committee that the evidence does not support the findings in "MH370: Mystery Solved", a new book by Canadian air crash investigator Larry Vance.

Foley told the committee that he has read the book, but still believes that the airplane was not being controlled when it impacted the water. He said that satellite transmission show that during the flight's final moments, it was in a fast descent and accelerating when the impact occurred. "If it was being controlled at the end, it wasn't very successfully being controlled," he said. "The flaps weren't deployed."

The author of the book says that the damage to a flap that was found washed up on an island near Tanzania in 2016 did not show the kind of damage that would have been caused by a high-speed impact. The other flaperon is being held by French authorities as evidence in possible criminal proceedings. The French authorities have not allowed any "meaningful" analysis, according to Foley.

Foley said that while it is not known who initially flew the airplane off course, it was "absolutely evident" that someone had. He said it was most likely that the plane was somehow depressurized in flight, and that everyone on board was likely already deceased when it went down.

Meanwhile, Ocean Infinity, a Texas-based technology company, renewed the search for the Boeing 777 this year after the government of Malaysia offered up to $70 million if the main wreckage or the plane's "black boxes" could be located.

(Image from file)

FMI: Original report

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 04.16.24: RV Update, Affordable Flying Expo, Diamond Lil

Also: B-29 Superfortress Reunion, FAA Wants Controllers, Spirit Airlines Pulls Back, Gogo Galileo Van's Aircraft posted a short video recapping the goings-on around their reorganiz>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.20.24): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.20.24)

"The journey to this achievement started nearly a decade ago when a freshly commissioned Gentry, driven by a fascination with new technologies and a desire to contribute significan>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.21.24)

"Our driven and innovative team of military and civilian Airmen delivers combat power daily, ensuring our nation is ready today and tomorrow." Source: General Duke Richardson, AFMC>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.21.24): Aircraft Conflict

Aircraft Conflict Predicted conflict, within EDST of two aircraft, or between aircraft and airspace. A Red alert is used for conflicts when the predicted minimum separation is 5 na>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC