USAF Tanker Bid Remains In Limbo | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Monday

Tuesday

Wednesday

Thursday

Friday

Airborne On ANN

Airborne 08.31.15

Airborne 08.25.15

Airborne 08.26.15

Airborne 08.27.15

Airborne 08.28.15

Airborne Hi-Def On YouTube

Airborne 08.31.15

Airborne 08.25.15

Airborne 08.26.15

Airborne 08.27.15

Airborne 08.28.15

EAA/ANN AirVenture Innovation Preview

AIP-#1 Vimeo

AIP-#2 Vimeo

AIP-Part 1 YouTube

AIP-Part 2 YouTube

Wed, Jan 14, 2009

USAF Tanker Bid Remains In Limbo

KC-X? What KC-X?

One of the stories we expected to be covering this year was the next round of bidding for the US Air Force's next-generation aerial refueling tanker, dubbed the KC-X.

If you recall last year's drama, Northrop Grumman won the contract to build new tankers based on the Airbus A330 airliner. Excited economic development officials in Alabama were beaming at the thought of all the jobs promised by Airbus parent EADS, which also pledged to produce other A330 variants there if the military tanker was approved.

But Boeing challenged the process as having been biased toward Northrop's bid, the Government Accountability Office of Congress agreed, and the Air Force finally agreed the project should be rebid.

Now, the Orlando Sentinel reports industry observers are predicting that given other priorities for the incoming Obama administration, any new KC-X bidding process may be put off till 2010 at the soonest, and that the Air Force might decide not to build the plane at all.

John Pike, president of GlobalSecurity.org, a defense-research firm, commented, "Frankly, I hope the tanker deal is one thing that does not survive the transition. Basically, there's really nothing wrong with the existing KC-135 tankers, and any case for replacing them is completely made up."

Opponents to that line of thinking counter the KC-135s are approaching 60 years of age... and while they benefit from excellent maintenance and regular upgrades, that's simply too old for aircraft that perform such a vital role.

Regarding the recent trend toward official protests of every new Air Force contract, regardless of who wins, Lexington Institute defense analyst Loren Thompson offers the one assessment on which everyone agrees.

"I don't know if we'll ever build the next-generation tanker," he quipped. "But we're sure building some good law firms in the process."

FMI: www.af.mil

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote Of The Day (08.31.15)

"Would we be willing to fly them in our plane to Paris? ... Yeah, we'd be happy to do that." Source: Columbia Sportswear CEO Tim Boyle's reply to his company pilot, Doug Perrill, w>[...]

RFP: ANN Considering Future Options For HQ Relocation

A Very Bright Future For ANN, Aero-TV, and Airborne May Require Some New Digs ANN may be looking for a new home... hopefully, a permanent one. We're currently inviting proposals fo>[...]

Airborne 08.28.15: 'Big' Bezos Announcement?, MA Aero-Taxes, Harrison Ford

Also: Barnstorming: The FAA v Hoover Fight Ain’t Over, Hail-Damaged Dreamliner, UAV Shooter Charged, NASA Global Hawk, MiG-21 Lancers, ICAO Manual Blue Origin founder and Ama>[...]

Klyde Morris (08.31.15)

We're Not Sure that Klyde Needs A Refresher THAT Bad... FMI: www.klydemorris.com>[...]

Aero-TV: "That's All Brother" -- Restoring a True Piece of Military History

History Comes Alive Thanks to A Magnificent CAF Effort The story of the Douglas C-47 named, “That’s all Brother,” is fascinating from two points of view. First, i>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2015 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC