Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Dec 01, 2010

Latest JSF Engine Problem ... It's Too Big For Navy Transports

F135 Engine Will Not Fit Through Standard COD Cargo Door Or On V-22 Osprey

The Navy is facing a significant challenge with the F135 engine developed by Pratt & Whitney for the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter ... they can't get spare engines to an aircraft carrier by air or sea.


File Photo

The Navy Times reports that, even when it is broken down into its five components, the power module and packaging on the F135 engine will not fit through the cargo door of a standard Carrier Onboard Delivery (COD) aircraft, or aboard a V-22 Osprey. It can be transported externally by the V-22 some 288 miles "in good weather," the Navy says.

The issue could come during a combat operation when replacement engines might need to be transported to carriers quickly. The primary issue with external carriage by the V-22 is in that rotor wash and heat generated by the engines could be dangerous to deck crew attempting to attach slings to the engine crates while the aircraft hovers over the deck. Add to that the fact that the Navy has no V-22's ... they all belong to the Marines ... and has no plans to order any.


F-35C File Photo

The Navy says the engine module and transport container weighs 9,400 pounds, which makes them too heavy to transfer to and from a supply ship while underway. The newer Gerald R. Ford-class carriers would be able to handle the load, but only one is expected to be operational when the first F-35 squadrons deploy between 2015 and 2018.

Still, the issue with the F135 engine won't bolster the fortunes of the alternate F136 engine also under development. A Navy spokeswoman said the alternate engine would have similar transportability issues.

FMI: www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.26.24): DETRESFA (Distress Phrase)

DETRESFA (Distress Phrase) The code word used to designate an emergency phase wherein there is reasonable certainty that an aircraft and its occupants are threatened by grave and i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.26.24)

Aero Linx: The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) The International Association of Missionary Aviation (IAMA) is comprised of Mission organizations, flight sch>[...]

Airborne 04.22.24: Rotor X Worsens, Airport Fees 4 FNB?, USMC Drone Pilot

Also: EP Systems' Battery, Boeing SAF, Repeat TBM 960 Order, Japan Coast Guard H225 Buy Despite nearly 100 complaints totaling millions of dollars of potential fraud, combined with>[...]

Airborne 04.24.24: INTEGRAL E, Elixir USA, M700 RVSM

Also: Viasat-uAvionix, UL94 Fuel Investigation, AF Materiel Command, NTSB Safety Alert Norges Luftsportforbund chose Aura Aero's little 2-seater in electric trim for their next gli>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 04.23.24: UAVOS UVH 170, magni650 Engine, World eVTOL Directory

Also: Moya Delivery Drone, USMC Drone Pilot, Inversion RAY Reentry Vehicle, RapidFlight UAVOS has recently achieved a significant milestone in public safety and emergency services >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC