AOPA: NOT Happy With Louisiana MOA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Oct 02, 2003

AOPA: NOT Happy With Louisiana MOA

Would Include "Lights Out" Training--Which Might Knock YOUR Lights Out...

AOPA has told the FAA that the agency should not grant a U.S. Air Force petition for a new military operations area (MOA) in Louisiana without modifications for safety and airspace reasons.

The Air Force wants to combine the Lady and Jones MOAs in north central Louisiana into one area known as the Hackett MOA and, more importantly, conduct lights-out night vision goggle (NVG) training.

"Neither Lady, Jones, nor the proposed Hackett MOA was on the list of lights-out operational areas the Air Force requested when they asked for an exemption from FAR 91.209 earlier this year," said AOPA Vice President of Regulatory Affairs Melissa Bailey.

"NVG training is unquestionably an important element of preparing for the national defense," said Bailey. "But just as unquestionably, lights-out operations — with no anti-collision or position lights — deny transiting aircraft the ability to fulfill the requirement to see and avoid other traffic.

"If the Air Force wants to conduct NVG operations in north central Louisiana, it should have included Hackett, Jones, or Lady in the request for exemption. At least one other proposed MOA was."

AOPA also told the FAA that the southern boundary of Hackett MOA ought to be changed. The Air Force proposal would put the boundary within 1 nm of Nachitoches Regional Airport (IER). AOPA suggested a change that would give IER a 4-nm buffer and allow normal operations from both of the airport's runways.

FMI: www.aopa.org, www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC