Some Lawmakers Question Exclusive USAF Contract With ULA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.21.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Wed, Aug 15, 2012

Some Lawmakers Question Exclusive USAF Contract With ULA

Encourage Competition For EELV Program

The chairman of the House Intelligence Committee and the panel's ranking Democrat have sent a letter to Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta urging the Pentagon to consider SpaceX and Orbital Sciences for a launch contract for a critical program.

Congressman Mike Rogers (R-MI) (pictured, left) and C.A. "Dutch" Ruppersberger (D-MD) (pictured, right) sent the letter August 2nd. In it, they say the U.S. Government heavy launch capability "lacks domestic competition and is unable to compete internationally due to high costs. These escalating costs leave a growing burden on U.S. taxpayers and our defense and intelligence budgets."

Currently, ULA has the only booster capable of lifting the military's heaviest payloads into orbit ... the Delta IV. Some payloads in the Evolved Expendable Launch Vehicle (EELV) program will tip the scale at 50,000 pounds. But in the letter, Congressmen Rogers and Ruppersberger say that "the good news is that new entrants such as Space Exploration Technologies (SpaceX) and Orbital Sciences Corp. are developing impressive capabilities that are breathing new life into the U.S. space launch market." They cite the Falcon 9 mission that launched a Dragon spacecraft for a successful docking mission to ISS.

"While long overdue, the Air Force should be commended for its current effort to reduce the cost of the ULA arrangement while studying the capability of potential competitors," the congressmen said. But "We are concerned that the Service may offer ULA a five-year "no compete" block buy of launches ... we are concerned that any EELV block buy that goes beyond three years' worth of launches will unnecessarily exclude competition.

"We also believe that we must work harder to reduce the barriers to new competitors for EELV launches, to include eliminating the infrastructure subsidy we provide to ULA and rapidly articulating clear entrance criteria for new competitors."

The Huffington Post reports that the EELV contract could be worth $19 billion. It is expected to be awarded next year.

FMI: http://rogers.house.gov, http://ruppersberger.house.gov

Advertisement

More News

Samson Sky Hits the Wind Tunnel

Improvements Stack as Brand Readies for Mass Production Samson Sky updated followers on its flying car progress, describing some of the travails of the wind tunnel as they get clos>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.22.24): LAHSO

LAHSO An acronym for “Land and Hold Short Operation.” These operations include landing and holding short of an intersecting runway, a taxiway, a predetermined point, or>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.19.24)

Aero Linx: Space Medicine Association (SMA) The Space Medicine Branch was founded in 1951 as the first constituent organization of the Aerospace Medical Association (AsMA). In 2006>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.19.24): Back-Taxi

Back-Taxi A term used by air traffic controllers to taxi an aircraft on the runway opposite to the traffic flow. The aircraft may be instructed to back-taxi to the beginning of the>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC