FAA 'Competition' Plan Requirements Impose Significant Burden on Airports | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

AMA Drone Report

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday

Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne-Unmanned w/AUVSI

Airborne On ANN

AMA 08.17.17

Airborne 08.14.17

Airborne 08.15.17

Airborne 08.16.17

Airborne 08.17.17

Airborne 08.18.17

Airborne-Unmanned 08.15.17

Airborne-YouTube

AMA 08.17.17

Airborne 08.14.17

Airborne 08.15.17

Airborne 08.16.17

Airborne 08.17.17

Airborne 08.18.17

Airborne-Unmanned 08.15.17

NEW!!! 2017 AirVenture Innovation Preview -- YouTube Presentation / Vimeo Presentation

Fri, Sep 05, 2003

FAA 'Competition' Plan Requirements Impose Significant Burden on Airports

Airport Organizations Assert That Air Service Is a Problem for Airports, Not Competition

Airports Council International - North America (ACI-NA) and the American Association of Airport Executives (AAAE) have submitted comments to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) on the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Competition Plan requirements. Specifically, the airport organizations addressed issues related to mandates that require large and medium hub airports submit lengthy justifications to receive their Passenger Facility Charge (PFC) revenues and the monies they are entitled to under the FAA's Airport Improvement Program.

"Our airport members believe that this is one of the most egregious examples of the federal government imposing significant burdens on airports without justification," said David Z. Plavin, President of ACI-NA. OMB solicited comments on the continued collection of information under Title 49 Section 40117(k) better known as Competition Plans.

While the FAA estimated that airports nationwide required 3,240 hours to comply with the regulatory requirement, ACI-NA's members report an estimated 8,000 hours, more than twice the FAA's estimate. In addition, the FAA's estimate did not include an average delay of 30.2 weeks in obtaining FAA approval -- delays that slow down, and raise the cost of, vital airport safety, security and capacity projects.

"At a time when airlines and airports are doing everything they can to cut costs, it is time for the Congress and the FAA to eliminate or at least reduce the burden of these needless requirements," asserted Plavin. "Attracting air service is a primary duty of an airport director, we don't need what passes for encouragement by the Congress or the FAA," he continued.

"DoT regulations already enable air carriers to file complaints with DOT if they feel they have been denied access," said Todd Hauptli, Senior Executive Vice President for AAAE. "The final mandate to airports was expanded significantly from the original legislation and leaves airports not only shouldering a huge burden, but forced to go back to DoT to ask for the data to meet these detailed reporting requirements," he added.

In the comments ACI-NA cites U.S. Department of Transportation data that reports significant gains in market share by low-fare carriers over the last three years calling into question whether there is any competitiveness problem in the aviation industry today. "With many of the airports that are required to report facing reductions in scheduled flights and available seats well over 20 percent (June 2003 compared to June 2000), the problem for these airports is not competition but air service," according to ACI-NA and AAAE's comments.

[ANN has requested, and awaits, the FAA's response --ed.]

FMI: www.aci-na.org/docs/OMBcomments.pdf

Advertisement

More News

AMA Drone Report 08.17.17: MULTI-GP Int'l Open, Drone v Chicago, Reno Drone Race

Also: Yuneec Extended Service Plan, UAV on A/C Carrier, Blue Angels Incident, Drone Operator Safety Act MultiGP’s 2017 MultiGP International Open, conducted on the grounds of>[...]

Airborne 08.18.17: NBAA v KSMO, Sully Attacked, DB Cooper Update

Also: New NASA Admin?, Anti-Aviation Hypocrites, Airberlin, Sky Hopper, Drone v Carrier, Jet Aviation, Airman Retires The NBAA joined five other stakeholders to file a brief with t>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

RFP: ANN Seeking New Site/Facility For Major Studio Upgrade

It's Official: Aggressive Upgrades For New Airborne Programs WILL Require New Digs It's been in development for years, but we're getting to a point where we think we can pull off s>[...]

Airborne-Unmanned 08.15.17: Reno Drone Races, DoD CrackDown, Blue Angels v UAV?

Also: Kansas DOT-AirMap, CIRRUAS Drone Program, Daytona Beach PD UAS, Virginia UAS SAR The Reno Air Racing Association has signed an agreement with the MultiGP Drone Racing League >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2017 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC