Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Mon, Jul 10, 2006

Report: On-Demand Carrier Fatalities Loom Over Excellent Industry Safety Numbers

Charter Ops Average 2.2 Accidents Per 100,000 Flight Hours, Says Paper

The FAA, NTSB and other agencies are quick to point out to all who will listen that, by the numbers, this is the safest time ever to fly -- with the last major crash involving a domestic airliner occuring in November 2001, when an American Airlines jet went down in Queens, NY.

However, the picture isn't as rosy when you consider another segment of the aviation picture -- on demand operators. Or, more specifically, small cargo aircraft -- the kind that fly small packages and check stubs throughout the country -- as well as air taxis, charter operators and EMS helicopters.

The Miami Herald reports that, on average... one of these aircraft have been involved in a fatal accident every month, from 2000 to 2004.

The private air cargo auditing group Robert E. Breiling Associates told the paper that in 2004 alone, small cargo planes averaged 2.2 crashes for every 100,000 hours of US operation -- compared to rates of 0.11 for corporate jets, 0.13 for scheduled air carriers, 0.90 for business travel and 1.51 for scheduled commuters.

Furthermore, these accidents are up to 50 times more likely to result in fatalities, according to the NTSB.  

Alas, the only category with a higher crash rate is general aviation -- whose accident rate is nearly three times higher.

The Herald does not go into detail on ways to solve this problem... but it cannot be argued that better training would go a long way towards bringing that rate down. Many on demand operators also fly older planes... with older systems and avionics, as opposed to the newer technologies found in more advanced aircraft.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Unfortunate... ANN/SportPlane Resource Guide Adds To Cautionary Advisories

The Industry Continues to be Rocked By Some Questionable Operations Recent investigations and a great deal of data has resulted in ANN’s SportPlane Resource Guide’s rep>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.24): Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) An airport lighting facility providing vertical visual approach slope guidance to aircraft during approach to landing by radiating a directio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC